Life in a Medium Bad, Medium Cool Multicultural Neighborhood

No multicultural social scientist (almost all social scientists) will do accurate research on this topic, so you are stuck with my small sample fallacy case study.

I live in a majority Hispanic neighborhood in the former United States. I have lived in poor neighborhoods most of my life. As multicultural neighborhoods go, mine is not too bad, though like most neighborhoods it gets worse with each passing year.

What is life like here?

Every morning the grounds are filled with trash (bottles, diapers, you name it). Porters and a few residents (me) clean up.

Young, adult white professionals sometimes move in. They don't last more than a few months. One day at the apartment office, I saw a new white neighbor in tears, begging to escape her lease.

I have never seen a white child living in my neighborhood. None. Even supporters of multiculturalism, somehow have an unconscious awareness that this is no place for white children. Multiculturalists blame bad neighborhoods on the mysterious power of poor whites and white r*cism. Johnny Knoxville made a documentary film about the wonders of living in Detroit for white professionals. I don't remember seeing a white child anywhere in the documentary. Knoxville's white professionals lived in urban islands, seldom experiencing much of Detroit, pursuing hedonistic dead ends.

Panhandling is aggressive here. Note of advice: panhandling relies on the foot in the door technique. If someone asks you for a quarter and you give it to him, he will pressure you for more. The tricks keep getting more sophisticated. I saw a man faking a seizure to get help from gullible whites. Another guy stumbles around in the middle of residential streets with a blind person's cane asking for help getting to a school for the blind. Woe to her who falls for the foot in the door technique.

Parked vehicles get dozens of mysterious dents. But I have never seen a nonwhite fess up. If you happen to ding a neighbor's vehicle and do the honorable thing by reporting it and paying for damages or having your insurance pay, you will still be berated by your neighbors. But don't expect your neighbors to report any damage they do to your vehicle. Fortunately, newer vehicles have flexible side mirrors, so mirror impacts seldom cause damage now.

Teenagers throw food, wrappers, and other objects at parked vehicles from balconies.

During my eleven years in my present neighborhood, I saw many crimes (fraud, thefts, assaults, and many property crimes). The rate of punishment for crime is less than one percent. Most crimes are not reported to the police. Football coaches say they want to hear the hitting. I hear the crime through my walls.

My neighbors know police seldom do much unless a serious crime occurs or someone gets caught in the act.

Unprovoked assaults: one night a car passenger threw a beer bottle at me. Another night, a truck passenger threw a partly frozen egg at me, yelling "Got 'em," hitting me below the sternum. I thought it was a slush ball until I smelled egg. While walking across a bridge, a teen punched me, almost knocking me in front of a passing car.

Law enforcement has little interest Wall Street crimes and the ongoing conquest of the West.

But law enforcement is interested in jaywalking in my neighborhood, passing out warnings and tickets with aplomb, as if facing the consequences of your own street crossing decisions were a serious matter. Police tell you that crossing at intersections is statistically safer. But the police don't tell you that intersections are statistically safer only for pedestrians who recklessly cross streets. I've been nicked twice by pickups making illegal right hand turns at intersections. I've never come close to being hit away from intersections because I make sure to never cross when vehicles are near. At intersections, you are at the mercy of drivers' decisions.

But leash laws go unenforced, fitting with the trend of ruling groups ignoring or rewarding creators of negative externalties but wanting to punish creators of positive externalities. I've been bitten twice by Hispanic's dogs.

Reddit tells you to wear headphones. Wrong. Headphones may reduce the rate of minor harassment, but headphones make you an easy target for more harmful crimes.

Hispanics throw nails and screws on lawns and parking lots. Lots of them. Leaf blowers and lawn mowers assist the great screw migration into tires. I had at least a dozen flat tires in the past 14 years. Despite severe osteoarthritis, I pick up hundreds of nails and screws each year. No matter the condition of this neighborhood, the land lords will not tolerate the abomination of leaves and grass clippings.

Nonwhite crimes directly cost me at least $1000 per year. Break ins alone cost me over $4200 during the past decade. The ethical costs are far larger.

Youths block stairwells and act peeved if you try to pass. "Excuse me," has a slow response time here, no matter how polite you are. Neighbors allow their dogs to defecate in stairwells. You must look down before you step out a door. Trash also ends up in stairwells, including slippery items.

Neighborhood pets and feral animals are infested with fleas. If you have no pets, your apartment will still have flea problems from fleas hopping rides on you as you walk toward your apartment. I spend over $80 every year flea bombing.

The stare. The ghetto stare. Whatever you call it. Non-white men and boys employ it. The message is difficult to mistake: "This is our land now, white people. You have no business being here. We don't care if you, your parents, and grandparents built this neighborhood."

Noise is constant. Sirens, music, fights, traffic, video games, you name it. I sleep with earplugs and a white noise machine. Surprisingly, I seldom hear gun shots.

Ambulances repeatedly visit the same apartments, an expensive sympathy seeking ploy.

Rents skyrocket thanks to increased demand from migrants and to multiculturalists trashing apartments. One nearby apartment was remodeled before a Puerto Rican family moved in. When they moved out, the place had to be remodeled again. The stench from their dogs was so rotten and embedded in the apartment, maintenance placed an ozone machine in the doorway for several weeks.

Traffic keeps getting worse. Left turns are death defying. Several cars have been T-boned in front of my apartment.

Several years ago a Mexican acquaintance told me I should rely on Mexican plumbers and mechanics because they (allegedly) charge less.

Terrible idea.

Mexican businesses see whites as prey. And you will pay for incompetence: My car mysteriously stalled one day, so I took it to a nearby Hispanic shop. The shop charged me over $800 for a new fuel pump, then incorrectly put everything back together. Later, at a white repair shop, I learned the real problem was the crankshaft position sensor (much cheaper to replace).

I asked a Mexican place for an estimate to change my fuel filter. They told me the old filter was rusted on and the fuel line around the filter would need replacing (very, very expensive). I took it to a white shop: No problem replacing the fuel filter. My brake lights stopped working. It took a Mexican shop eleven hours to find an open circuit. I watched the mechanic from the waiting room, and it was obvious he had little electrical training.

My right turn light stopped working. A Mexican shop found it impossible to repair and gave me my car back.

I asked a Mexican shop for an estimate on replacing my AC condenser. The estimate was nearly $900. A white shop replaced it for under $700.

I always take my car to white mechanics for repairs now or repair my car myself, no matter how far I must travel to find a white shop.

But Mexican shops are good for one thing: passing annual inspections. My car has flaws that should fail it every year. Yet hispanic shops keep passing it every year.

But wealthy multiculturalists might say, "My Hispanic maid and gardener are so nice." Some news: I have spent many hours listening to nonwhite service workers berate their white employers. Thanks to genes and cultural Marxism, nonwhites are devoted to anti-white supremacism from an early age. They see no good reason why in their view, an inferior white person should be the employer and they should be the employee. In some cases, they have a point. Why should white school teachers earn $60,000 per year teaching cultural Marxism and worthless information? Public school teaching is a very, very difficult job, but a job's difficulty is little indication of its moral benefit. Those sweet, obsequious nonwhite service workers change their tone once they get home and don't need to be nice for money. And they have many relatives with surly dispositions, who consider service work beneath them.

Migrant service workers are lose-lose-lose for working class whites. Migrants drive down wages. Working class Westerners lose their lives, schools, cultures, families, neighborhoods, and tax money. Migrants provide (mostly) status services to wealthy multiculturalists, who already have far too much status and power. Rich people need to clean up their own toilets. It's good for character. Rich people wrecked America with Randism, globalism, neoconservatism, and cultural Marxism. All the money the rich possess would pay only a fraction of the past, present, and opportunity costs of their actions. Not surprisingly, wealthy multiculturalists seldom pay the payroll taxes they are required to pay for their workers.

The benefits are for the rich multiculturalists and the costs are for the proles.

How do migrants find so much money to send home? One way is by violating leases and sharing small apartments with several migrants, apartments that supposedly prohibit more than two individuals, creating another negative externality for working class whites: increased water bills because water bills are often divided equally among apartments.

No matter how much the mass media desensitizes us to crime, when your friends and family are the ones being assaulted and burglarized vivid feelings of violation and degradation arise. Some days I have a lump in my throat and sinking feelings.

The media cite studies claiming non East Asian groups are no more likely to commit crimes than whites. Those studies use self-reports, where evidence indicates nonwhites are many more times than whites to make fallacious claims.

Whatever the thousands of pro-establishment fallacies whites tell themselves, most whites are comparatively scrupulous about telling personal life truths. This willingness to tell interpersonals truth may have assisted the rise of the West. But the unwillingness of millions of whites to tell political truths is behind the demise of the West.

The long-term white residents here have low wage jobs or severe physical disabilities. Or both.

I would move to Maine or Montana, except I get chronic sinus infections in cool weather and my wife has rheumatoid arthritis.

To wealthy multiculturalists, we're just white tr*sh. How do the wealthy know? That's what the mass media tells them everyday. And that's one way the wealthy sooth their self-contradiction filled souls--with fictional falsehoods and small sample fallacies.

Republican strategist Rick Wilson gained attention when he said alt righters "childless single men who masturbate to anime." Less remarked upon was Wilson's follow up totalitarian assertion: "These are not people who matter in the overall course of humanity." If they don't matter, why are the ruling groups so insistent about ruling over them and wrecking their lives? Wilson likely believes the same applies to anyone else who tells the truth about the Republican establishment.

I would rather live in an all white poor country with a median income of ten dollars per day and a maximum income of 20 dollars per day than this place. Land would be cheap or free to squat on. Without multiculturalism, there would be fewer long commutes. Nearly all our living expenses would be a fraction of what they are now. That's how nonwhites survive in nonwhite countries. They can support families on a few dollars a day because food is their only significant expense. It's easier to raise a family on five dollars per day in Bolivia than on 50 dollars per day in the West.

Many whites would prefer to live in an ethical society with an ethical espirit de corps, to build better futures. But what do our societies offer? Selfishness mixed with xenocentrism. Both forms of harm causing will create ethically worse future generations.

Peaceful secessions and other separations are necessary.

The Genetic and Environmental Path to Peace

An argument by Sarah Mathew uses unrepresentative sampling, Turkana tribes in Africa, to conclude that human alliances are often arbitrary and:

the moral sphere of humans readily extends to include culturally similar people. This is useful because it implies that we could possibly expand the moral sphere by creating perceptions of cultural similarity. Finding the common thread that connects disparate cultures may not be just a cliché, but an evolutionarily backed-up path to peace.

We don't need to look at the Turkana to see that alliances are arbitrary. Looking at history, we see millions of alliances that were self-destructive and ethically destructive.

More recently, we see billions of votes being cast for establishment political parties when doing so is against self-interest and ethical interests. Ordinary voters even donate massive sums against self-interest and ethical interests.

Looking for some cultural common thread or "perceptions of cultural similarity" is not a path to peace. It is a path to misplaced altruism and increased egoism, already known as cultural Marxism. The Turkana ally with ethnoracially similar allies. Put them with whites or Northeast Asians and the Turkana will instantly exploit weaknesses, no matter how much multiculturalists try to indoctrinate us that we are all the same deep inside.

The Turkana almost certainly have much genetic and economic competition within their own "egalitarian" societies that Mathews does not tell us about.

The better path to peace is self-determination, free speech, real democracy, just economies, ethical reasoning, ethnoracially homogenous populations, ethically eugenic breeding, lack of xenocentrism, avoidance of geopolitical salience, severe punishment for legalized bribery, severe punishment for egoism, and defenses that make aggression hugely reckless for those at the top pursuing aggression.

The Man or Woman of Some Sort of Reason

The most upvoted reply on a Reddit thread comes from a terrible genre of writing, the genre of imitation well-reasonedness, the fake voicing of reason. My comments are in brackets:

This post and OP are a perfect example of what is wrong with /r/politics right now [ad hominem and false claim]. No reasoned thought [false claim and straw person]. No civil discussion [false claim and straw person]. No critical thinking [false claim and straw person]. Sketchy sources to say the least [false claim and a self-contradiction]. Where has the intellectual debate gone [false claim]?
For example, this post. Fun fact, the New York Times Editorial Board endorsed Hillary Clinton today, not the New York Times [false dichotomy]. EVERY NEWSPAPERS' EDITORIAL BOARDS ENDORSE CANDIDATES [ad populum]. They have been doing it forever [appeal to tradition]. Hillary Clinton is the leading candidate for the Democratic Nomination right now [ad populum] and if you actually read the column, you would understand that they made a choice based on pragmatism [false claim], which is OK [false claim]! There are multiple points of view on every subject [irrelevant], unless you come to /r/politics [false claim]. As a long time political observer [faulty expertise], I was shocked to see in the sub outrageous statements made about the NYTs today [irrelevant]. For well over a hundred years, it has been the gold standard (along with the WSJ and others) for quality news and reporting [false claim and faulty expertise]. It is sad to see how some react to the paper as a whole when the Editorial Board endorses someone not named Bernie Sanders [straw person]. In addition, the article in question was a news piece, not an Editorial piece [false dichotomy].
Also, OPs like this are literally SPAMMING this sub [ad hominem]. Check it out, an account for like 8 hours that literally only posts pro-Bernie, anti-Hillary [ad hominem]. This isn't an isolated case. Look through these forums. They are everywhere [false claim]. Don't get me wrong, new voices and opinions are always welcome in the community [false claim], but when they are created solely for the purpose of pushing an agenda, while not breaking any rules, is still rather slimy [ad hominem].

The post was also gifted Reddit gold.

Most arguments in this genre end up supporting establishment totalitarianisms for some strange reason. Hint for would be social scientists: Do some research on this genre. But that runs into the problem of social scientists not being good at reasoning either.

The Great Filter

So what acts as the Great Filter? Why haven't we been contacted by alien civilizations?

My Guess is that at least one of the following applies:

1. Life is rare.
2. Intelligent life is rare.
3. Intelligent life is rare in environments having physical resources for interstellar actions. (Intelligent ocean life has a difficult time developing interstellar technologies.)
4. Most intelligent life stinks at moral reasoning and action, leading to takeovers by psychological and evolutionary egoists, preventing civilizations from ethically and technologically developing the ability to colonize or communicate long distances. This has already happened numerous times with human civilizations. Internal egoism and tribalistic outgroups destroy the civilizations. 
5. Technologies of nihilism or hedonism prevent sufficient advancement and interstellar activities. (For example, a few individuals in advanced societies can create bioweapons and other weapons of mass destruction.)

On the plus side, at least we haven't been destroyed or conquered by robots from elsewhere, yet.

Tips to Acquire Blog Readers

Just kidding. Look at my blog stats.

That's what happens when you're an actual independent rather than a party supporter disguised as an independent. Readers reject you because you don't fit their indoctrinated worldviews.

Or maybe not kidding.

Fanfare for the Salt-of-the-Earth Man, Woman, and Child

James Thompson has a solid post on welfarism, arguing that individuals on welfare, not surprisingly, increase dysgenic breeding. 

A few decades ago, writers would lump the top 20 percent in income together, though individuals barely in the top 20 percent had little in common with the top 0.1 percent, at least economically.

It's been standard practice for generations to lump those with lower incomes together in the working class, though many of those labeled working class have little in common besides income. Many individuals labeled working class receive means tested benefits or would if they had the opportunity. Others labeled working class react with horror at the idea of welfare, correctly viewing welfare as free riding.

I call this latter group the salt-of-the-earth working class. The salt-of-the-earth working class has been besieged for decades by the trash cultures spread by the top one percent--Hollywood!--and the trash cultures of welfare recipient groups. The salt-of-the-earth working class tries to avoid welfare groups but is often stuck in the same neighborhoods as the welfare class, especially with increased immigration and increased dysgenic breeding. 

Part of Putnam's hunkering down in diverse neighborhoods probably results from the salt-of-the-earth working class avoiding social interaction with welfare recipients. 

The salt-of-the-earth working class tends to have the highest moral character in societies, doing the most important jobs in societies. Unlike the rich and upper middle class, the salt-of-the-earth working class is more likely to reject the fallacious narratives coming from the top.  

The salt-of-the-earth working class is lower income for many reasons, including lower IQs, lower incidences of dark triad traits, preferences for productive professions, and because salters were raised in bad schools and bad neighborhoods, often experiencing the harmful effects of high residential mobility as their parents searched for decent jobs in the new economy.

Almost no one in the top one percent has qualms about their own free riding.

The salt-of-the-earth working class consists of reciprocal altruists while the wealthy and welfare recipients are prone to psychological and evolutionary egoism.

Little research exists on the differences among welfare receivers and the salt-of-the-earth working classes. Many in the the salt-of-the-earth working class view themselves as middle class, though their incomes are below the median.

Jayman remarked that white on white breeding in recently decades has been slightly eugenic for IQ but that raises questions about breeding for character traits. Intuitively, it seems breeding among the salters has plummeted because public policies have become disastrous while child rearing, decent schools, and adequate housing have become much more expensive--and salters don't want to burden others.

These distinctions are, of course, ignored by the economic and intellectual ruling classes, who tend to view their alleged inferiors as white tr*sh, their views about working class individuals formed from small sample fallacies--trash television and poorly reasoned rubbish they read in ruling group media.

Sunday's Random Arguments

Self-contradictions again: 
Lauren Weinstein wonders why twitter hasn't banned Donald Trump in her post loaded with ad hominem attacks--"creepy," "vile bully," "white supremacist," and "raised by hyenas." Of course, Weinstein appears not to notice she could be banned for the same things. Multiculturalists continue to spew billions of super slurs at whites without the slightest bit of cognitive dissonance while demanding that whites be censored.

This is how genocide works. The participants dehumanize outgroups while not being aware of self-contradictions, whether slow genocide or fast genocide.

We're lucky to have multiculturalists and their racism detector kits. Moral facts multiculturalists don't want to hear qualify as racism. But objectively unethical behavior by multiculturalists (assaults, indoctrination, bad laws, you name it) qualify as good for the cause.

Another cost of multiculturalism:
Nonwhites bring increased rates of abusive animal practices, including halal slaughtering, alone chaining, dog fighting, cock fighting, and dumping millions of unwanted pets. Migrants seldom spay or neuter animals. Migrants dump unwanted pets, often creating vicious dog packs. The abuse of animals on farms is already atrocious enough.

Why do we assume we would be much better individuals if given a new life:
Why not act well with our current lives? Temptations will be as great with new lives. Instead of self-pity for our present selves, maybe we should have some compassion for our future selves and reform our lives. The more things are done to please the self-of-the-moment, the more future selves suffer until the self-of-the-moment is crippled by previous selves-of-the-moment. We rage at our past selves. We forget that our past selves would have abhorred our present selves.

Paul Krugman comes out against cultural Marxism without realizing it:
Krugman writes:

1. The WSJ editorial page is wrong about everything.
2. If you think the WSJ editorial page is right about something, see rule #1.

The WSJ editorial page supports open borders and many other multicultural policies. Krugman's rule is actually somewhat useful. The times when the WSJ editorial page is right--rent control, for example--are so rare that the WSJ editorial page qualifies as a wasteful time sink.

Overheard at work:
Man: Don't hate the player. Hate the game.
Woman: I hate the player.
Man (to nearby man): See! Women be tripping.

While walking past a group watching 12 Years a Slave:
First Man: Hollywood only allow one revolutionary movie per year.
Second Man: Did this come out the same year as the Dallas Buyers Club?
First Man: That ain't revolutionary. That's just gay.

Why Would an Ethical Individual Care About Presidential Debates?

We know what these people are about. They have track records. They are infused with Machiavellianism and other horrific traits.

Hillary Clinton mixes third wayism with neoconservatism and cultural Marxism.

The Republican candidates mix Randism, neoconservatism and cultural Marxism, except Trump on Russia and invasion issues.

What about Rand Paul? He supports legalized bribery. That makes him at least semi-neoconservative because defense industries and foreign entities do massive amounts of bribing on behalf of neoconservatism.

Bernie Sanders mixes socialism, neoprogressivism, and cultural Marxism.

Making a faux pas or clever point during a debate doesn't reveal candidate character. It reveals the characters of viewers who fall for halo effects. Debates are similar to job interviews, and research suggests job interview performance does not predict job performance.

New Day, Similar Garbage.

 Branko Milanovic attacks straw persons again and again in favor of invasions.

Pro-migration economic studies do not support migration because those studies leave out most of the economic costs, especially long-term economic costs. In short, those studies are junk science.

He concludes, "I do not think that the three effects I listed here (and perhaps there could be others) are sufficiently strong to negate the positive economic effects."

Perhaps there could be others?

You mean like the proven facts of massive moral harms, including massive dysgenic effects, and massive replacement of good cultures with horrific cultures?

Plus the costs of relentless ad hominem attacks like Milanovic's "xenophobia."

The moral costs of mass nonwhite migration are hundreds of times greater than any asserted economic benefits.

And an F for History

Perhaps you've seen the Old Economy Steve meme. The meme depicts Kenneth W. Kiser from Ohio, who reached his late teens in the early 1980s.

To call the meme massively inaccurate is an understatement. The overwhelming majority of claims attached to the meme are fallacious.

The U.S. economy in the late 1970s and early 1980s was atrocious, worse than now, especially for young individuals. Unemployment peaked at over 14 percent. The 1980s and late 1970s were the McJobs era. The median income of young families with children declined in the 1970s and declined roughly 30 percent in the 1980s despite wives joining the work force.

Individuals born after the early 1950s ferociously competed for minimum wage jobs. Cedar Point amusement park in Kiser's home state held massive group job interviews for atrocious, minimum wage summer jobs. Only a small percentage of those applying were hired.

Later Boomers and Generation Xers worked hard. They had to. They were fired for the slightest infractions.

Private sector union jobs were almost non-existent for young adults then. Almost no one mentions what really happened. In the late 1970s, Republicans, Third Way Democrats, labor unions, and businesses reached tacit agreements. Older workers would keep their union jobs or get early retirements. Young adults would get laid off or shut out. The media complied by hyping the dog vomit new economy. New, non-union subcontractors worked young adults like dogs for minimum wages while a few miles away old workers at union jobs goofed off much of the time.

Trade deficits, budget deficits, and economic unfairness soared before Kiser was old enough to vote.

The global super rich deserve most of the blame. The alleged Greatest Generation deserves some of the rest. Those born between 1915 and the early 1950s were the ones who got good jobs and got to retire early, not the Old Economy Steves.

The so-called Reagan boom was for the rich, not young adults or working class individuals.

The Steves deserve criticism for partying hard and being politically apathetic and unorganized, but not the horse pucky spread by the meme.

I just shake my head at Reddit and similar sites.

Worst Quotes, Buzzwords, and Catch Phrases from Marxism I Can Recall

Yeah, I know. There are so many to pick from:

"The long march through the institutions."
"Microaggressions."
"Cultural enrichment."
"Blacks can't be racist."
"Arab spring."
"Democracy is the road to socialism."
"Diversity is our strength."
"The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property."
"Refugees."
"The only antidote to mental suffering is physical pain."
"White privilege."
"The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."
"Undocumented immigrants."
"Not real Muslims."
“Everything is relative in this world, where change alone endures.”
"Islam means peace."
"Racism is power plus privilege."
“The greatest purveyor of violence in the world: my own government.”  (Martin Luther King, Jr. during the Mao era that murdered over 45 million.)
"Permanent revolution."
"Kill all the whites."
"Boring from within."
"scientific socialism"
"Real Marxism hasn't been tried."
"Race is a social construct."
 “I’m not afraid of nuclear war. There are 2.7 billion people in the world; it doesn’t matter if some are killed. China has a population of 600 million; even if half of them are killed, there are still 300 million people left."
"War between Capitalism and Communism is inevitable."

Additional suggestions are welcome.

Horserace Interlude

Donald Trump shifted his views on dozens of issues to match establishment Republicans, including adopting many atrocious establishment views. Trump still gets demonized by ruling group Republicans.

The main dissent left in Trump is on immigration and opposition to conflicts with Russia. For decades, immigration patriots and economic populists donated to and voted for ruling group politicians while getting massive harms and almost nothing beneficial in return. Unlike the candidates most favored by the ruling groups, Trump cannot back track on invasion issues without losing most of his support. This is actually an rare, astounding development, almost democratic. Establishment politicians have been able to stab citizens in the back on major issues for decades without major repercussions.

Trump seems to be aware that betrayal on immigration risks most of his support.

Trump should realize that as long as he is pro-life, pro-immigration patriotism, and pro the Bill of Rights, his supporters will not desert him. He has room to maneuver. Kowtowing to the Republican establishment gains him little.

Ted Cruz feigns slight support for immigration patriotism, but many immigration patriots aren't falling for it, knowing Cruz will switch back to little more than the usual mixture of Randism, neoconservatism, and cultural Marxism if elected.

Since publicizing minor scandals has little affect on Trump's support and since cognitive dissonance is rare among multiculturalists, expect the mass media to continue to escalate the frequency and vehemence of their slurs.

The multiculturalists who criminalize fact facing thoughts have no problem with the slurs multiculturalists spew.

Tuesday's Random Thoughts

Evidence coming from multiculturalists is conspicuous by its absence. If they had good evidence, they would be bombarding us with it. Instead, they bombard us with slurs, straw persons, junk science, small sample fallacies, deontological assertions, and other fallacious rhetoric.

***********

The Wyoming area is not a good place for long term alternative communities because of the Yellowstone super volcano. Volcanic ash resembles lung destroying shards of glass. Most mammals within 1000 miles downwind of a super volcanic eruption would die from ash, not to mention global cooling.

***********

The Return of Kings promotes the crypto totalitarianism of Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera is devoted to bait-and-switch. It pays Joseph Stiglitz and other liberal or third way writers to provide cover for the real agendas of Sharia and stealth jihad. The ruling group of Qatar owns Al Jazeera, the same ruling group the governs with massive totalitarianism. If the Qatari rulers gave a crap about liberalism, they would implement more than token amounts in their own societies, but they don't, except to trick environmentalists and economic populists into supporting cultural Marxism and other mass harms to infidels.

Monarchism is a very, very wrong turn for the alternative right.

***********

The more ruling groups engage in rent seeking, the more ruling groups promote inaccurate us-and-them rhetoric. (And as someone once misquoted Pat Buchanan, S and M rhetoric.)

The power of antiwhite super slurs (b*got, r*cist, white tr*sh) to intimidate and manipulate ethnoracial realists declined. Unfortunately, ethnoracial realists make a small sample, false denial of a cause conclusion from their own situations, thinking that the power of the slurs is gone. But most whites still live in dread of being called antiwhite super slurs, willing to sell out goodness just to avoid being called super slurs by individuals with despicable, poorly reasoned arguments. Most whites still wallow in the antiwhite totalitarianism of mass media and other establishment institutions, as if they were corks on an ocean, tossed around by slurs, straw person attacks, and other fallacious rhetoric rather than waves.

***********

In alliances led by a super power, smaller nations free ride on the defense spending of the super power. The smaller nations engage in more reckless or destructive actions that they should, thinking they have the backing of the super power.

***********

Several years ago Amnesty International tagged the ruling groups of 135 of 175 nations granted Most Favored Nation trading status as human rights abusers. Wonder how Amnesty International defined human rights abuse? If the definition included denial of freedom of association and other evils, the numbers would be 100 percent.

***********

Counterintuitive fact: in the 1950s and 60s, the murder rate in Japan was four times greater than England. (Now the murder rate in England is over three times greater than Japan.)

***********

When citizens automatically recoil at unfamiliar, well reasoned policy ideas, a civilization’s moral education is broken.

***********

Which would be a worse result for a person? A: to have a mind capable of endless pleasure until death. B: to have a mind no longer capable of pleasure due to the pursuit of hedonism.

***********

Norman Solomon and Martin A. Lee once remarked that out of 3,000 journalists surveyed in 1985, only 37 percent of editors believed that government should do something to reduce inequality. Never mind that government is relentlessly doing things to increase inequality. Fifty-five percent of a similar sample of citizens believed the government should help reduce inequality. Nations are always picking for something genetically and economically.

***********

At least one explicit or implied claim in a genuine contradiction must be false.

***********

The “imposing values” and “fact-value distinction” assertions are rhetorical tricks to get us to acquiesce to the promotion of bad values.

***********

Multiculturalists avoid boredom, cognitive dissonance, and fear of death by alternating among misplaced empathy, misplaced hatred, and other existential issue avoiding emotive states.

Issues in the mass media are often emotively loaded but seldom discussed in ways that would cause anxiety for media viewers. Well reasoned arguments are avoided. The accused bad folks are groups and individuals viewers do not identify with, whether the accused are bad or not.

***********

It's fascinating how situational changes massively change the goodness or badness of actions. The U.S. joining a Western anti-Hitler, anti-Hirohito alliance prior to 1939 might have been a beneficial idea, a horrific idea from January 1940 to June 22, 1941, a beneficial idea from June 23, 1941 onward.

Then again, it might have been a bad idea anytime before the U.S. developed a monopoly on nuclear weapons, and a good idea afterward, though no one knew the feasibility of nuclear weapons then.

**********

Cultural Marxism pushed whites out of the Democratic Party. At one time, the percentage of Democratic whites exceeded Republican whites roughly 45 percent to 30 percent. The idea that Republicanism represents some pure expression of whiteness is nonsense. Whites believe Marxism, third wayism, Republicanism, and various other ideologies mainly via indoctrination. The fact that whites are so flexible and easily indoctrinated in such a wide variety of ideologies is mystifying, especially given the way whites become fanatical once they become indoctrinated in ideologies such as Nazism, globalism, paleo-Marxism, neoconservatism, third wayism or cultural Marxism.

Whites of that era deserve criticism. They fled the super cultural Marxism of the New Democrats for the bait-and-switch militarism, cultural Marxism, and robber baronism of the Republicans, failing to organize against all those evils.

We're paying the price today.

***********

Almost all the costs of dysgenic mass migration go to nonwealthy Westerners and thousands of future generations. The much smaller benefits go elsewhere. Yet wealthy multiculturalists have the chutzpah to demonize nonwealthy whites.

The contradictions are massive and despicable. Wealthy multiculturalists isolate themselves in nonmulticultural neighborhoods, requiring massive sacrifices from nonwealthy whites while sacrificing almost nothing themselves, destroying freedom of association for nonwealthy whites while retaining de facto freedom of association for themselves.

In the West, you have freedom of association if you are wealthy, Muslim or nonwhite. If you are a nonwealthy white, you don't.

A Bookshelf for Families with Children

If your children don't have electronic gadgets or you strictly regulate their usage, most intelligent kids will start reading your bookshelf books out of curiosity or boredom, providing a way for you to indirectly influence your children.

For young children:

1. the better Christian children's books. Even if nonreligious, your children should gain familiarity with a little bit of Christian culture.
2. non-ideological childrens' books, so your children will develop reading skills. Older books from second hand stores are less infected with the poorly reasoned propaganda of cultural Marxism.

For older children:

1. logic and consequentialist ethics books. Look hard for books not filled with cultural Marxism.
2. ethnoracial fact facing books, including Race, Evolution, and Behavior by JP Rushton. Dysgenics by Richard Lynn. Paved with Good Intentions by Jared Taylor. Future Human Evolution by John Glad. The Perils of Diversity by Byron Roth. 
3. biology and physical anthropology, including The 10,000 Year Explosion by Cochran and Harpending. Sociobiology by EO Wilson. Signals by Timothy Perper.
4. up close accounts of war and past times to discourage the self-pity and self-absorption teenagers have. Other examples include Go Ask Alice and The Good Old Days: They Were Terrible!
5. photo albums
6. some books on blue collar activities, so your children don't see the college prep track as the only alternative, so they develop some handy man or handy woman skills.
7. prepping
8. books on various other policy issues, including secession, economics, democracy, corruption, and the environment.
9. body language and general psychology, The Nurture Assumption is especially helpful because teenagers get bombarded with Freudian and psychobabble ideas blaming parental practices for things teens don't like, including things they don't like about themselves.
10. a guide to manners and etiquette. Even if someone plans on breaking rules, it is good to know the rules.

Print worthwhile articles and throw them into three ring binders, especially when it comes to logic, ethics, prepping, and public policies. Individuals need much practice at fallacy recognition.

If your children are permitted to use electronics, downloading materials to a family e-reader and to the desktop of a family computer is also a good idea.

Yes, these books are hard core. But there is no evidence that reading harsh facts harms development. Kids benefit from street smarts. If your children have grown up in a diverse neighborhood, they have already experience harsh realities. Kids feel confused, alienated or pressured by the behaviors of their peers. If kids grow up sheltered, they end up easily exploited in schools and workplaces. Ideological vacuums tend to get filled. If your children aren't thinking well and forming their own belief systems, with indirect assistance from yourself, they will fall for the nihilism, hedonism, cultural Marxism, and additional fanaticisms peddled by others.

But what if visitors see these books? The books could open the door to fruitful discussions. But what if a boss or gossipy coworker sees them? Then you should probably put sensitive books in your bedroom, then keep visitors out of the bedroom, so you don't get doxed or worse.

Nurture assumption alert: attempts to directly encourage your children to read your books might backfire, especially if you have children who reflexively recoil at suggestions made by mom or dad.

Why not mass culture books? First, they're rotten. Second, your children will be exposed to massive amounts of mass culture BS from outside sources, so it is not as if they will be exposed to only the worldviews of your bookshelf.

Remember to punish your children should they call anyone ethnoracial slurs and explain why it is wrong to use slurs. You can't directly influence your children once they are out of your sight, but you can prevent them from influencing siblings and peers with slurs in your presence.

Contradictions of Multiculturalism, Part I

Multiculturalism is riddled with billions of contradictions.

On the rare occasions someone confronts multiculturalists with their contradictions, multiculturalists respond with irrelevancies ("What about so and so") or dismiss the contradictions from their minds. Note that multiculturalists seldom notice the contradictions on their own. Ethical reasoning is not their thing. This behavior includes philosophers, individuals societies trust with teaching logic and ethics.

Twelve big contradictions:
Multiculturalists use totalitarian government actions to force dysfunctional diversity on nonwealthy whites while multiculturalists flee dysfunctional diversity.

The sacrifice contradiction: Wealthy multiculturalists destroy the jobs, lives, schools, cultures, incomes, countries, families, and neighborhoods of nonwealthy whites while wealthy multiculturalists benefit from cheap labor and divide-and-rule practices.

Multiculturalists support freedom of association for nonwhites but not for whites.

Multiculturalists incessantly bash whites for the behavior of dead whites while minimizing the importance of worse actions by dead nonwhites and present day nonwhites.

Multiculturalists deny refugee status to peaceful whites fleeing disasters created by multiculturalists (Ukraine, Zimbabwe, and South Africa) yet grant refugee status to nonwhites devoted to invasion, conquest, and mass destruction.

Multiculturalists support freedom of speech for multiculturalists but not for ethnoracial fact facers.

Multiculturalists claim to support democracy while destroying it.

Multiculturalists claim to be open minded, yet almost all mass media fights to make sure well reasoned counter arguments are unseen and unheard.

Multiculturalists claim to be egalitarian, yet engage in massive amounts of economic rent seeking (parasitism).

Ordinary whites who simply want freedom of association for all humans are constantly called fascism related slurs, yet multiculturalists having ideological similarities to Marxism and fascism imagine themselves to be holy.

Multiculturalists think it okay to talk about eugenics and dysgenics if you call it idiocracy and associate it with white tr*sh. But if you mention the words eugenics and dysgenics, then suddenly eugenics and dysgenics become off limits to discussion.

Multiculturalists demonize the victims of dysgenic breeding caused by multiculturalists' own policies while not blaming themselves.

Friday's Random Thoughts

The ability to get a job as an opinion maker is inversely proportional to willingness to tell the ethical truth.

**********

National conversations on race consist of liberal multiculturalists and conservative multiculturalists. Any fact facer mistakenly invited would be considered a thought criminal (fired, harassed, assaulted or ostracized). The liberal multiculturalists bash whites with poorly reasoned arguments. The conservative multiculturalists do likewise but throw in some poorly reasoned personal responsibility rhetoric. Nevermind that those needing personal responsibility the most are genetically and culturally not inclined to listen to personal responsibility rhetoric.

**********

The "only whites can be r*cist" rhetoric implies whites are subhumans and nonwhites are gods with automatic virtue, no matter their behaviors.

**********

Contemporary Christian leaders aid billionaires devoted to the destruction of the West, distracting followers with ethically unimportant issues--school prayer, creationism, the Pledge of Allegiance, flag burning, and nativity scenes. Worse, these leaders encourage ethical misbehavior by emphasizing grace, the rapture, and Armageddon. In the meantime, the West gets destroyed by combinations of Randism, globalism, neoconservatism, third wayism, and cultural Marxism.

**********

The more important the issue, the more inaccurate Wikipedia becomes.

**********

We seldom feel like starting duties. Start them anyway. The aversive feeling usually passes. Waiting until the right feeling wastes too much time.

**********

Almost all humanities or social science degree holders support one or more of the following horrific ideologies: Randism, neoconservatism, hedonism, xenocentrism, cultural Marxism, paleo-Marxism, third wayism, globalism. Some support four or more of those ideologies. So to hell with the propaganda that the organized humanities and social sciences produce great human beings.

**********

The multicultural circle of life: Promote dysgenic breeding and vile actions, especially bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw practices. Blame whites. Promote more dysgenic breeding and vile actions. Blame whites. Promote more. Blame whites. Whoops, there aren't any whites left.

**********

Almost any time someone in the mass media claims a perceived opponent says, wants or believes something, the mass media claim will be a straw person.

Almost any time some one in the mass media tries to demonize someone by quibbling with a few minor claims, especially statistics, it will be a massive straw person. Politically unpopular writers will often publish books with thousands of claims and statistics. Some critic in the mass media will look for the few errors and try to demonize the author.

**********

Wall Street gives Barack Obama a 17 percent approval rating despite the fact that Obama helped Wall Street at the expense of ordinary citizens.

The pro-Wall Street Congress has an eight percent approval rating.

Freedom of Secession Association

Twenty-four percent of respondents to a 2014 Reuters poll support secession for their state.

But, oddly, there isn't a single decent website on secession. You would think for a topic so momentous, sites would proliferate.

Secessions should happen but not at the state level. The empire split in two model will fail also. You end up with the same totalitarianisms--blue states controlled by third wayism, red states controlled by neoconservatism.

But wouldn't the blue states become more progressive and the red states more alternative right?

Not likely.

Blue states would attract Libertarians, secular neoconservatives, nonwhite migrants, and others devoted to free riding and ruling group totalitarianisms, yet turned off by Christian neoconservatism. You end up with a hell run by the likes of David Brooks, Patri Friedman, Haim Saban, Reza Aslan, Prince Bandar, Al Sharpton, Joe Lieberman, and Louis Farrakhan.

Red states would attract multicultural, neoconservative pro-lifers. Pro-lifers consider abortion more important than other issues combined. Research suggests that pro-lifers who converted from Democratic to Republican over the past couple decades simply ditched their previous views on other issues, that is, they converted to Christian neoconservatism. You end up with a dystopia run by the likes of Rick Perry, Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, and Sheldon Adelson.

Any good split must create dozens of new nation-states, one each for Third Wayers, Libertarians, religious neoconservatives, secular neoconservatives, conservative ethnoracial fact facers, nonconservative ethnoracial fact facers, black secessioners, Hispanic secessioners, to name a few.

The first key for fact facers is ending dysgenic trends and reintroducing eugenics. The second key is good laws that fight free riding (rent seeking), plus citizens moving heaven and Earth to make sure those laws are enforced.

Present empires and crypto colonial states will eventually break apart or become more dystopian simply due to ever increasing dysgenic breeding and free riding. Groups of ethical, reciprocal altruists prosper when they separate. If groups don't separate, creeping evolutionary and psychological egoism result. Reciprocal altruism exists now because the ancestors of today's reciprocal altruists split from tribes that became increasingly dominated by egoism and tyranny. And they kept on splitting, usually with their kin and their kins' genes for reciprocal altruism.

Now that (some) humans understand reason and evolution better, some splinter groups should consciously direct their evolutions, to keep free riding in check, potentially preventing the costs of splitting.

But contemporary groups dominated by egoism and Machiavellianism use technology to try to lock in dystopian societies with servant altruistic classes and ruling groups devoted to egoism--as we see today today with ruling groups using the electronic mass media for an onslaught of despicable rhetorical tricks.

Be careful what you support. You could end up worse.

Winning Hearts and Darts from Non-Westerners

One little noted feature of Western self-destruction is the refusal of almost everyone in the ruling groups to verbally defend the West, not to mention their unwillingness to defend Western individuals.

Sure, they'll promote Islam, Randism, globalism, neoconservatism, third wayism, and cultural Marxism, but those are anti-Western beliefs.

Leaders won't stand up against cultural Marxism and say billions of non-Westerners owe their existences to Western science, technology, and generosity. Instead, leaders join the irrelevant, anti-Western, ontological guilt train. Why did Swedes acquiesce when Jesse Jackson hectored them with fallacious, genocidal rhetoric?

China prattles on about its "century of humiliation." Western leader dare not challenge the multicultural narratives. No leader mentions that Imperial China was a totalitarian, Malthusian hell. Females had their feet bound. Almost any Chinese man could be murdered for almost any reason, including having the wrong hair style.

No leader states that the West saved millions of Chinese from enslavement and destruction at the hands of the Japanese in the 1940s, then again from Maoism during the past 40 years.

If Chinese leaders were so great, why did millions of Chinese flee to Western enclaves in Shanghai and Hong Kong?

Russian leaders continue to play their victim games without mentioning the centuries of invasions and subjugations Russian leaders and the Soviet Union engaged in. Russia didn't become the world's largest country by accident or free association.

The supporters of globalism, neoconservatism, and third Wayism, who despise us as they rule us, want us to pivot to Asia and Russia, to intensify conflict with Chinese and Russian supporters of globalism and multiculturalism, who also despise us. This is not our fight. This is battle of egoism versus egoism among the global rich. No one in China, Russia, and the West should obey the military prescriptions of the ruling groups.

Multiculturalists tell us the mass slaughter of the American Civil War was necessary to end the evil of slavery in America, but fail to mention the far more brutal slavery and tribal wars practiced by Amerindians prior to the arrival of Westerners. Nor do they pay attention to today's slavery, often allying themselves with those spreading forced labor.

Barack Obama tells us the former United States is “one of the biggest Muslim nations” and thanks Muslims for "building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”

Right.

Thanks for stealth jihad, the police states, and all the legalized bribery on behalf of OPEC.

Western leaders have been disasters. Their egoism and groupthink bring continuing ruin. And nonwealthy Western individuals are starting to run low on available ruin.

The Cons of a Big Con

Beliefs and actions common among various forms of Marxism from Stalinism to multiculturalism (and a few other ideologies as well):

The cause matters more than the humans affected by the ideology, especially when both the means and ends are evil. Ideology and rage at perceived opponents suffice as substitute opiates of the masses. Critics get accused of anti-intellectualism despite the blatantly poorly reasoned arguments of the cause.

Free speech is for Marxian leaders or followers only.

The atrocious results of Marxism must some how have whites or opponents as the most important causes. Good things must have Marxism or nonwhites as the causes, for example, the cottage industry devoted to overstating the scientific contributions of Muslims.

Believers think triumph is inevitable, life will magically get better once whites or other opponents are gone. Counter evidence gets ignored, dismissed, distorted or demonized. Contradictions gets noted in the actions of opponents, not within Marxism. If it makes Marxian leaders feel good, others must imagine it is good. Cognitive dissonance is for whites and opponents. Moral facts (those from HBD writers, for example) must be made to appear as shameful, unthinkable thoughts. Believers should feel guilty only for not fighting correctly for the cause.

Military means mix with "boring from within" and the "the long march through the institutions." Once institutions are taken, believers bombard individuals with slurs, small sample fallacies, straw person attacks, and other fallacies. Believers act as if repeating fallacies turns fallacies into facts.

Instead of accurately developing and weighing arguments, followers focus on finding the most effective talking points to intimidate or manipulate.

Gurus get worshipped, especially those spewing pseudo profound jargon.

Rulers sow confusion, alienation among enemies. When behaviors of Marxian leaders become too evil to ignore, the evils must magically be relabeled no-true-Scotsman fallacy style into "conservative," "not Islamic," or "not real Marxism." Followers blame the victims. Rulers practice bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw. They chant the magic buzzwords and catch phrases (equality, diversity, compassion) and watch as opposition melts away. Platitudes and kumbaya activities cover the real goals.

And remember "no enemies to the left."

Followers act as if labeling intuitions and junk research scientific makes the the intuitions and junk research accurate.

The specific economic system is a lower priority, varying from communes, Maoism, Castroism, Stalinism, socialism, to cronyistic contemporary Chinese economics (but the system must follow the rule of from each according to what can be extracted from them, to those toward the top).

Found an Old Note to Myself

In July 2011, I Googled the following phrases:

"Sociology of terrorism" (14,600 Google results)
"Sociology of Sharia" (three results: first, a pro Sharia "social constructionist approach to the study of Sharia," then two copies of incoherent musings at Millatfacebook.com)
"Sociology of dhimmitude" (zero results)

You see the intersection of groupthink, the vividness bias, the garbage values of multiculturalism, and the junk science of sociology.

Priorities.

More Random Thoughts

Differences among multicultural liberal political parties (Green, Labour, Democratic) and multicultural conservative parties (Tory, Republican, Libertarian, Constitution) are largely arguments about how fast to destroy the West and how fast to increase rates of rent seeking from the tops and bottoms, with Libertarians and neoconservatives preferring the most and fastest destruction. The often unstated end is similar for all of them.

The longer we wait to reform the West, the higher the costs to ourselves and future generations. But real reformers have almost no power now. And most Westerners swallowed ruling group propaganda for so long, Westerners have few ideas about what should be done.

As ruling groups steal more power, their promoters emphasize the greatness of thousands of things, except organized nonwealthy citizens, labeling increases in available propaganda or consumer goods democracy while real democracy flounders, claiming we have bio wiring for what benefits them, but no wiring for what HBD discovers. Ruling groups call activities and technologies that indoctrinate or kill time healthy or educational. Instead of talking about moral beings, they talk about whatever slurs they can attach to nonwealthy individuals.

No one should let even the most wonderful of Muslims into their land, including diplomats. The children of these wonderful Muslims will behave according to genes and and non parental environments that the wonderful Muslims have little control over. And if they are so wonderful, they wouldn't be Muslim to begin with.

If you don't consciously make massive improvements to your environments and keep making them, you will end up surprised at how easily destructive elements insert themselves into your life.

The Consumer price Index is a faulty measure of inflation and living standards. The government admits that the CPI does not measure living standards. Home productivity (self-cleaning, home-cooked meals, etc.) plummeted during the past generation. The CPI measures quality improvements, but fails to accurately measure the ways new products are new and worse. Switching from incandescent bulbs to fluorescent bulbs, for example, causes sleep disorders because of blue wavelengths in fluorescent lighting. Antibiotics continue to lose effectiveness. Quality improvements were greater during the 1945 to 1973 period. Growth during that period was more likely understated than in recent decades. The total fertility rate at the peak of the baby boom roughly doubled the current total fertility rate. Comparing the number of toys adults have now versus then does not help. Parents had less money for toys in the 1960s because they had many children to support. Individuals had much less destructive diversity around them.

Many individuals push gun bans, not because of the bans objective merit, but because:

1. they have been baited into it
2. doing so makes them feel good about themselves without them having to do much good
3. vividness bias
4. doing so helps the divide-and-screw agendas.
5. all of the above

Afterall, they get much less worked up by things with fewer benefits and greater harms than guns--cars, smoking, dysgenics, asbestos, alcohol, bioweapons, motorcycles, cultural Marxism, nuclear weapons--to name but a few.

Some people who describe borders as arbitrary or pointless, nevertheless think this or that actor or sports team is ethically superior and worthy of support, though doing so is trillions of times more arbitrary and pointless.

Screwing People Over

A field of knowledge consists of many accurate, well understood ideas within that area. If a ten-year-old memorized an accurate article about astronomy, she would not be knowledgeable in that field because knowledge requires a huge number of accurate, well-understood ideas.

Trump gets criticized for not knowing politics and policy issues. And they're right.

The problem is that almost all other ruling group Western politicians have similar flaws. Their knowledge consists of how to screw people over, call it the political SPO field. These politicians have little knowledge of logic, ethics, and policy reforms. If you asked most ruling group politicians what Pigouvian taxes we should enact, their answers wouldn't be close to right, many wouldn't know the meaning of the word Pigouvian.

Ruling group politicians know thousands of leaders, lobbyists, diplomats, and advisors. They memorized thousands of talking points. But the talking points are either fallacious or intended as bait-and-switch morsels. They have political SPO knowledge, but not ethical and policy knowledge. Politicians are altruistic toward their friends and relatives, at the expense of the people. But since they are devoted to egoism, politicians easily believe helping allies is the same as doing their duties for the people.

Most people become national politicians because they want more power, status, and money, no matter what they claim their ethical motives are. In evolutionary terms, this is called psychological egoism.

Trump also has SPO knowledge from business fields, note his ability to have his corporations file for bankruptcy without his own wealth being destroyed. Trump's egoism is well documented.

That's why a random person walking down the street would likely be a better president than most billionaires or national politicians. The random person is less likely to be devoted to egoism. The professional politician will parrot or come up with all sorts of SPO schemes and fallacious rhetoric to support the schemes. Often Congressional bills will be written by lobbyists.

The random person turned politician might just say no to many such schemes, realizing what is at work.

We are now subjected to a plethora of poorly reasoned "As a lifelong Republican..." articles warning us about Trump, the fake centrism on full display. Being a lifelong Green, Republican, Democrat or Libertarian does not make one an expert. If anything, it makes one guilty. These authors would rather vote for a totalitarianism that starts a super war with China or Russia than anyone who opposes the invasion and annihilation of the West by migrants. These lifelong articles contrast Trump with the disastrous presidency of Reagan. The authors assume readers will be unaware of Reagan's real record, the over 30 percent decline of median incomes in young families with children during the 1980s, despite massive increases in wives working. Instead, the fairy tale emphasizes winning the Cold War and the Reagan boom, nevermind that the West lost the Cold War and boom was only for the wealthy.

You might as well vote for yourself rather than anyone the ruling group political parties offer.

The Media and Me

There's no ethical reason to financially support Hollywood or browse any mass media website. Almost everything politics related that mass media sources publish is poorly reasoned propaganda. On the few occasions they publish something worthwhile, better websites will have it or link to it.

The current mass media have no ethical right to be mass media. They have stolen the electromagnetic spectrum, the rightful property of the people. In other words, they are using the property of the people to demonize the people and trick the people into paying for their own demonization. The mass media are over interested in making money and over invested in pushing the agendas of individuals devoted to egoism and mass destruction.

They have no right to our time or money.

I can't think of a single major celebrity I admire. There is not a single one I think of as more deserving of respect than random persons walking down the street. It feels good to not be on the celebrity worship train. I would not pay a dime to have my photo taken with any of them.

Random Thoughts

The larger the society, the more likely rituals and ceremonies will seem a joke, the more likely elites will use rituals and ceremonies to control and harm ordinary individuals.

Most of us do not know what it like to live in cultures where most moments are opportunities for moral creation. Our societies dedicate themselves to dreading the good, what some call the demoniacal, a mixture of shallowness, indifference, laziness, escapism, self-absorption, and a reflexive dread of good acts.

Complete rejection by ruling groups who seek to destroy us is exhilarating.

Both tribalism and the current editions the nation states are disasters, the cartels of totalitarianism.

The doctrine that if the  president does it, it is not illegal is support for a dictatorship. A president could, after all, declare herself president for life, then declare it not illegal. And, of course, it would be legal for the president to be a mass murderer. Even benign dictatorships produce destruction. In the long run, benign dictators die. “Long live the king” was not an empty line. It expressed a not unreasonable fear that the next king would be worse.

********

Global warming has the benefit of mitigating the mass destruction caused by super volcano winters.

********

The use of terrorism as a bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw wedge issue by the ruling groups is bad enough now. Imagine how bad it will get if terrorism sky rockets or new totalitarian technologies emerge.

**********

Conversation I overheard at the library yesterday: 
A woman asked a librarian for books on counterfeiting. During the search, the librarian (surprisingly) asked the woman why she wanted such books. The woman started hemming and hawing for an awkwardly long time, then said, "For a class... (more hemming and hawing). I'm studying to be a cop."

**********

Thought experiment: Let's imagine a world where white and Asian women were hideous, worse than any other women on the planet, worse looking than hyenas. Let's imagine white men being sexually aggressive, looking to impregnate every woman they could. How would that change present political dynamics?

***********

Many individuals fight off existential anxieties with hate, especially multiculturalists unaware of their own motives, who find feelings of purpose and superiority by hating whites.

**********

Establishment Western political parties have one job that ethically matters more than almost all others. Prevent demographic invasion, conquest, and subjugation. And none of them do it.

**********

Read publications promoting communism from two or three generations ago. Some of them are stored on Ron Unz's archive of magazines. Many of today's multicultural writings paraphrase the biocultural arguments of communism. So, yes, multiculturalism is cultural Marxism. And, yes, Stalin, Mao, Mugabe, and Kim Jong Il were spewing multicultural nostrums.

**********

Suppose donating money to corrupt charities makes one feel good? What if the charities cause the spread of lower activity variants of the MAOA gene, the variants that causes aggression? What if millions of individuals get murdered 70 years from now thanks to that charity?

**********

What do women want? What do men want? Within specific genetic and environmental limitations, men and women want what their genes and societies tell them is cool to want. But men and women don't want to think genes and societies influence over themselves. Men and Women want to think they are unique or rebels. When the driver blasting music pulls up next to you, he wants you to think, "Wow. That guy has great taste in music. He's awesome." But almost no one actually thinks that. The music is off putting unless tastes match.

**********

To the multiculturalist, the awareness of self-contradictions seems not to exist--and the multicultural media do not point them out. Maybe multiculturalists heard Bobcat Goldthwaite make a contradiction joke about gated communities a few decades ago, but that was just a joke, right? Bobcat's joke was quickly replaced by tons of other infotainment.

**********

Instant realization: I have never heard the speaking voices of nearly everyone in today's Congress. The exceptions: Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Marco Rubio, and John McCain. Man, I love not watching TV.

**********

Nationalism by whites in Britain, France, Greece, Poland, America, and elsewhere saved the the world from Nazism, communism, Islam, and dozens of other evil ideologies and invasions, so before we condemn all nationalism by whites, realize the good. Without nationalistic whites all the advances in medicine and agriculture that saved billions of lives would not have happened.

**********

Overheard:
Protestant Filipina: Your [Catholic] church got damaged [by an earthquake]. Our house [protestant church] was protected by God.

(at work)
First Man: Throughout history great thinkers have known that certain books contain codes. Newton--
Second Man: Yeah, the The DaVinci Code.
First Man: No, not The Davinci Code. Newton, Einstein--
Second Man: That's the DaVinci Code.

(at Cabela's)
First Man: I came home [from a business trip] and one of them [migrants] was sleeping in my bed. I was shaking.
Second Man: I don't worry about that. Jesus protects me.
First Man: You don't believe that shit, do you?
Second Man: It helps me. It's gotten me through a lot of stuff. I keep my Bible in my truck, right next to me. It stays right there, protecting me. I haven't had to slam on my breaks ever since I put it there.

Hip Hop Recording Engineer: If you could see what I see. I record a lot of songs that could change the world. But the record companies don't want all that. Sometimes they allow one or two political songs. Sometimes I record 20 tracks, ten will be revolutionary. But the record company will allow only one revolutionary song. Sometimes not even that.
Man: Kill all the whites.

Wealthy Filipina: You don't understand. Ordinary Filipinos are b*cteria. They pretend to be simple and humble to trick you. They're like that. They're always looking for some way to trick you. They know all the tricks because they see the tricks all around them. They always want something for nothing. Even when they work: you hire one to fix your door. You come home. The door's all crooked and broken. Worse than before. And they demand to be paid. You just observe. You'll see.
Man: Really?
Wealthy Filipina: Don't get involved with b*cteria. Once they latch on, you lose.

**********

Battles among Western ruling groups with ISIS and similar groups involve unstated disagreements about slow jihad versus fast jihad. The Western establishments prefer to destroy the West slowly by migrant invasions. Fast jihad messes with the plan, arousing the concern of ordinary Westerners. Establishments prefer to keep the conquests and destructions unnoticed until too late.

Social and Political Hurdles for Ethnoracial Fact Facing

Complexity 
Ethnoracial Fact Facing is complicated. Ethnoracial Fact Facing makes thousands of often well-reasoned distinctions. Many individuals cannot or do not understand variance and other Ethnoracial Fact Facing concepts. It is easier, though wrong, to take the tribal position: Everyone outside the tribe should be considered enemies until proven otherwise. It is also easier, though unethical, to take the cultural Marxian position: assume everyone is the same, except blacks and Muslims and other allies, who are superior--and nonwealthy whites, who are inferior. Complicated, accurate  economic ideas also face hurdles. Economics is relevant to EFF because wealthy multiculturalists with simple economic ideas keep increasing their power and destructiveness.

Influence 
Cultural Marxism controls all major Western institutions, especially schools, churches, corporations, governments, and mass media. Japan and a few poor countries may be the only countries on earth not riddled with cultural Marxism and its allies. Even China, Taiwan, and South Korea are filling with variations of cultural Marxism. Almost every wealthy person supports cultural Marxism and their influence is anything but benign.

Misguided shame
Thanks to number two, whites feel irrational, unethical shame for believing anything other than cultural Marxism.

Nazism 
Thanks to the ruthlessness of Hitler and cultural Marxism, multiculturalists are able to fool individuals into thinking anything that is not multicultural is some form of crypto Nazism, guilt by non association. The mass media almost never tells us what most non multiculturalists actually believe. The media chants the irrelevant slurs N*zi, r*cist, b*got, and f*r right at EFF.

Moral universalism
Multiculturalists claim the title of moral universalists, though multiculturalists support antiwhite totalitarianism. Even many race realists falsely claim multiculturalists are moral universalists.

Numbers
Western Europeans and their descendents are a plummeting share of the world's population.

Genes and cultures
Most whites are genetically and culturally predisposed to xenocentrism. They regard any all white group as creepy, though whites see nothing wrong with all nonwhite groups. Whites, especially wealthy whites, massively harm other whites in ways they do not harm nonwhites.

Legalized bribery
Wealthy multiculturalists can bribe almost any policy into existence. Worse, most individuals tolerate or support legalized bribery.

Stealth
Multiculturalists are playing the long game. They work to annihilate whites over many generations. Whites ignore gradually escalating evils until it is too late. Belief in the importance of future generations has been subtly indoctrinated out of whites.

Coalitions
Multiculturalists have indoctrinated all major nonwhite groups into being antiwhite. Even nonwhites ethically similar to whites, having little in common with blacks and Muslims, support antiwhite tyranny. Nonwhite rulers in the West incite antiwhite, mutually destructive conflicts with China and Russia, probably because rulers do not identify with nonwealthy whites and view whites as a disposable subspecies.

Hedonism.
Duties seem odious, hedonism fun and easy, though in the long-run, hedonism leaves us empty and unhappy.

Vision
Many ethnoracial fact facers have difficulty articulating ethical alternative societies. Few ethnoracial fact facers are policy experts. Few, if any, have play money to create alternative societies. Many withdraw to their own lives and families. Many are wary of anyone who disagrees with them on almost any political issue. Ethnoracial Fact Facing will need to overcome mutual hostility over minor issues. Ethnoracial Fact Facers need to agree to live harmoniously with each other despite differences on nonmulticultural issues. Bad policies on other issues come and go, but destruction by multiculturalism is permanent.