They Called It Civic Nationalism

So-called civic nationalism is slower multiculturalism. Civic nationalism merely postpones the date the last white will take his or her last breath by a few decades, a way for establishments to prolong the grift and better manage the decline until they and their loved ones die of old age.

The phrase civic nationalism is euphemistic and inaccurate. At the very least a civic minded nationalism must:

1. oppose almost all inward migration by racial outgroups.
2. oppose ethnoracial based affirmative action and other advantage taking by outgroups.
3. prevent racial ingroups from population declines.
4. try to avoid self-destructive and mutually destructive military activities.
5. prevent divide-and-screw oligarchism.

None of the above applies to Putin or anyone else commonly labeled a civic nationalist.

Street Smarts and Book Smarts

Many whites are book smart but not street smart, which leads to the question of why: probably genes for docility and conformity play roles, and fears of not being liked, even by strangers. But that leads to the paradox that the more you degrade yourself trying to be liked, the more you end up hated. Those pursuing bullying or other advantage taking sense weakness.

Parltly, it's lack of self-respect caused by anomie, incoherence, and cultural Marxism. Street wisdom violates cultural Marxian norms for whites, whether secular or avuncular.

White tendencies toward empathy and compassion seldom differentiate among deserved compassion and misplaced compassion. For that, we need good reasoning, something mass media and powerful groups oppose with fury. Some whites have book smarts but not the ethical and logical book smarts they would benefit from. Many whites get repeatedly fooled by aggressive panhandling, yet seem unaware they are being tricked by the foot-in-the-door technique and other tactics of deception.

Establishment Totalitarianism Strikes Again

Recently, my local library featured a banned books display, warning against censorship.

This, at a library system that engages in despicable censorship.

Almost all nonmulticultural and self-determination websites are blocked for "intolerance" or being "advocacy groups." Some economic populist sites are also blocked, including Citizens for Tax Justice. Even Nick Bostrom's philosophy site on human survival issues is blocked for being "non-traditional religion." Almost all personal blogs are also blocked.

Not surprisingly, Salon, Alternet, SPLC, and various other sites devoted to anti-white genocide and totalitarianism are not blocked, no matter how many slurs they spew at whites, no matter how evil their curriculum.

The contradictions are breathtaking.

I won't say what city this is because I'm in no mood to be stalked and doxxed.

Down, Not Out

I've been out of action because of health problems. I will be back blogging soon.

Paradoxes of Contemporary Families and Societies

In contemporary societies, if you increase the incomes of single women using establishment methods, single women will spend more money on hedonism and dysgenic breeding. If you decrease the incomes of single women, then you have more children in poverty. If you try to reduce family poverty using establishment methods, victims of establishment dysgenics migrate to white middle class and white working class neighborhoods, ruining far more lives and neighborhoods (the biocultural imperialism of dysgenics and cultural Marxism).

The same goes for many other men and women, with much money wasted on harms and seduction games.

If you give more power to white altruists practicing xenocentrism, they'll commit evils, often the misplaced compassion and misplaced loyalty varieties, until they are back in degraded, low power positions (millions of working class whites paying taxes and voting for establishment candidates, for example). The same results from individuals practicing egoism mixed with xenocentrism (Bob Geldof, Angela Merkel, the Koch brothers, and millions of others).

Societies get ruined for almost everyone.

How do we escape the dysgenic and cultural Marxian traps:

1. Give a right of secession to all groups and individuals. Add freedom of association rights to constitutions.
2. Pay Muslims and nonwhites to leave the West.
3. Fund comprehensive sex and eugenics education. 
4. Spend more on embryo selection, plus genetic engineering research and development.
5. Federally fund schooling and advertising that demonizes dysgenics the way eugenics has been demonized for the past several generations.
6. Federally fund sperm banks drawn from high IQ, high character teen boys and young men, charging minimal fees to users. Subsidize egg donation by high IQ, high character young women.
7. Ban migration to the West by Muslims and nonwhites, then enforce the bans.
8. Require a sixth month waiting period before marriage.
9. Create adequate Pigouvian taxes on most negative externalities, including pollution and advertising.
10. Gradually require white individuals to raise at least three white children to be eligible for Social Security. Use Pigouvian taxes to pay for Social Security. White individuals failing to do so must provide their own retirements or work until disabled.
11. Ban government funding, including student financial aid, for universities and vocational schools that teach anything other than nursing, medicine, engineering, natural sciences, and vocational skills.
12. Sterilize all fertile, convicted felons. Require surgical sterilization among fertile welfare applicants as condition for receiving welfare.
13. Rescind all government aid to migrants and sanctuary cities.
14. Pay former special education students to be sterilized.
15. Break off diplomatic relations with any nation that refuses to take their migrants back, parachuting criminal migrants back to their home countries when home countries refuse to take their citizens back.
16. Eliminate tax entitlements for religions and other charities promoting political agendas, including property tax entitlements.
17. Punish (severely) employers hiring Muslim and nonwhite migrants.
18. Enforce surrogate contracts.
19. Eliminate welfare and affirmative action.
20. Fund paid maternity or paternity leave in proportion to the number of years worked.
21. Make public high schools for only the top 25 percent of students. Require the bottom 75 percent of 14 to 19-year-olds to obtain jobs or attend public vocational schools lasting less than two years. Give any teenage student a right to drop out. Permit public schools to expel any student above the age of 12 for any reason without legal interference. Permit K-12 teachers the right to refuse entry into their classrooms any student they think should not be in their classrooms.
22. Ban public universities from requiring non-major students from taking courses in the so-called humanities and social sciences.
23. Ban public schools from employing struggle sessions and oaths of loyalty to diversity.
24. Create party list proportional representation.
25. Give the stolen electromagnetic spectrum back to the people.
26. Require publicly funded and corporate created media that travels across public property or uses the electromagnetic spectrum to serve the public interest, not egoism, militarism, and cultural Marxism. Ban ownership of media by non-citizens.
27. Eliminate citizenship rights for nonwhite and Muslim anchor babies.
28. Ban government entities from hiring anyone with any degree in the so-called humanities.
29. Do more.

The transition costs are high, but the long term costs of continuing on the present path are astronomical for us and thousands of future generations.

The Fear, Optimism, and Demagoguery Game

This election season we've seen much of the words fear, optimism, and demagoguery.

Establishment thinkers label you an optimist if you support militarism, parasitism, and cultural Marxism, if you believe the fallacious statistics manufactured by the establishments, if you call whites dozens of slurs.

If you tell the truth about Islam and nonwhites, you're not considered an optimist. Establishments conflate vapid cheerleading for their own wealth and power with better forms of patriotism. Ad hominem appeals to fear and optimism get treated as more important than the evidence.

The likes of David Brooks, Barack Obama, Thomas Friedman, Andrew Sullivan, and George W. Bush are often respected because they are seen as optimists, no matter the consequences of their actions.

If you have a an anti-establishment idea with beneficial consequences, then you're not considered an optimist.

But there is no good evidence that optimism causes politicians to be good for a country. Tojo, Hitler, Hirohito, Kaiser Wilhelm, and Czar Nicholas II, and thousands of other rulers rank among the most overoptimistic leaders in history. Evidence suggests positive thinking is often a terrible thing.

For over half a century, establishments have acted as if the people don't deserve the truth. Few ideas are are more cynical than that.

The establishments have been fear-mongering and demonizing whites for decades, but when you tell the truth about their crypto totalitarianism, then they accuse you of fear-mongering.

Demagoguery consists of emotively loaded, poorly reasoned arguments (though some emotively loaded arguments are well-reasoned).

Knowing that nearly all major institutions are controlled by multiculturalists and their allies, you'd thing Obama would pretend to be above the fray. Thousands of academics and mass media individuals are willing to do the demagoguery for Obama.

But no, Obama puts his optimistic knife of demagoguery in and twists:

"when study after study shows [studies hint or suggest, not show] that whites and people of color experience the criminal justice system differently [trite], so that if you’re black you’re more likely to be pulled over or searched or arrested [because blacks are more likely to do crime], more likely to get longer sentences [failure to control for crime severity and other factors], more likely to get the death penalty for the same crime [failure to control for geography and other factors]; when mothers and fathers raise their kids right [false claim] and have “the talk” about how to respond if stopped by a police officer -- “yes, sir,” “no, sir”--but still fear [irrelevant] that something terrible may happen when their child walks out the door, still fear [irrelevant] that kids being stupid [ad hominem] and not quite doing things right might end in tragedy [false claim]--when all this takes place more than 50 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act [irrelevant], we cannot simply turn away and dismiss those in peaceful protest as troublemakers or paranoid [straw person].  (Applause [ad populum].)  We can’t simply dismiss it as a symptom of political correctness or reverse racism [straw person]. To have your experience denied like that, dismissed by those in authority [straw person], dismissed perhaps even by your white friends and coworkers and fellow church members again and again and again -- it hurts [straw person]. Surely we can see that, all of us [false claim]."

The triumph of dysgenics over eugenics, especially character dysgenics, represents an ultimate triumph of optimism over reality.

The weary world wonders how much more of this optimism and mass destruction we will be forced to absorb.

Little Migration from Almost Anywhere

We should not support migration to white countries from anywhere, except white refugees from Zimbabwe and South Africa, including other whites moving from one Western country to another, except when engaging in the massively important task of seceding.

Why?

Because contemporary whites moving among white countries tend to be multiculturalists and others bringing harms. Even those less inclined toward globalism, hedonism, and multiculturalism are easily shamed with irrational guilt, thinking that if it is permissible for them, then billions of nonwhites should also have the right to move to the West. "I was an immigrant, too." Nevermind, the massive behavioral differences among immigrant groups.

Yes, white migrants helped make America a decent country, but today's white migrants bring more ideological baggage. Like nonwhites, they tend to view new lands as merely places to make money, having little attachment to the land and people.

There is also the risk of brain drain and a race to the bottom, with some white countries poaching white talent from other white countries, leaving the white country invested in developing that talent worse off.

There is also the rhetorical problem. When multiculturalists concoct fallacious economic stats and small sample fallacies touting the alleged benefits of migration, one of their tricks is to lump all migrants together, touting the benefits of nonwhite immigration by listing migrant white or Jewish inventors and entrepreneurs. I wish I had a dollar for every time I heard someone try to support third world invasions by listing the likes of Andrew Grove as a benefit of invasions.

Whites must view their homelands as a part of themselves that must be reformed. They must not view homelands as disposable wastelands, temporarily useful before escaping someplace else until the day cultural Marxism conquers the entire planet.

The big exception is secession. Ideally, hundreds of new white only countries would exist where individual whites could pick their citizenship, united in a military alliance, but without the horrors of cultural Marxism.

Degraded Normalcy

I visited the World News subreddit, viewing the top monthly posts. The first post mentioning the attack in France was at number 230: "France 'must learn to live with terrorism' - French PM Valls."

Cultural Marxism makes normalcy worse, demonizing or ignoring almost everything that contradicts cultural Marxism.

Unconventional Conflicts

Some individuals wonder why nonmulticulturalists focused so much on Rotherham, not other wrongs in the world.

Maybe because there is little Westerners can do about many other evils in the non-Western world. Or perhaps because multitudes of media types and government officials conspired (yes, conspired) for over a decade to hide the fact that thousands of white children were being held in rape slavery and refused to punish the offenders. Compare that reaction with the onslaught of outrage generated over the fabricated Tawana Brawley and Duke lacrosse cases.

Maybe because past history proves Rotherham is a harbinger of massive evils to come.

Multiculturalism is waging an unconventional war of aggression against whites. Most multiculturalists on this planet support the genocide of whites.

Why should we care when adult "civilians" waging wars of aggression suffer harms from their own despicable choices? We didn't force nonwhites to overpopulate their countries. We didn't force nonwhites to engage in massive amounts of dysgenic breeding. We didn't force them to believe horrific ideologies.

Anyone who believes nonwhites shouldn't be criticized for their choices because they believe humans are controlled by only genes and environments should at least be consistent and not criticize their political opponents, who would also be controlled by only genes and environments.