The ability to get a job as an opinion maker is inversely proportional to willingness to tell the ethical truth.
**********
National conversations on race consist of liberal multiculturalists and conservative multiculturalists. Any fact facer mistakenly invited would be considered a thought criminal (fired, harassed, assaulted or ostracized). The liberal multiculturalists bash whites with poorly reasoned arguments. The conservative multiculturalists do likewise but throw in some poorly reasoned personal responsibility rhetoric. Nevermind that those needing personal responsibility the most are genetically and culturally not inclined to listen to personal responsibility rhetoric.
**********
The "only whites can be r*cist" rhetoric implies whites are subhumans and nonwhites are gods with automatic virtue, no matter their behaviors.
**********
Contemporary Christian leaders aid billionaires devoted to the destruction of the West, distracting followers with ethically unimportant issues--school prayer, creationism, the Pledge of Allegiance, flag burning, and nativity scenes. Worse, these leaders encourage ethical misbehavior by emphasizing grace, the rapture, and Armageddon. In the meantime, the West gets destroyed by combinations of Randism, globalism, neoconservatism, third wayism, and cultural Marxism.
**********
The more important the issue, the more inaccurate Wikipedia becomes.
**********
We seldom feel like starting duties. Start them anyway. The aversive feeling usually passes. Waiting until the right feeling wastes too much time.
**********
Almost all humanities or social science degree holders support one or more of the following horrific ideologies: Randism, neoconservatism, hedonism, xenocentrism, cultural Marxism, paleo-Marxism, third wayism, globalism. Some support four or more of those ideologies. So to hell with the propaganda that the organized humanities and social sciences produce great human beings.
**********
The multicultural circle of life: Promote dysgenic breeding and vile actions, especially bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw practices. Blame whites. Promote more dysgenic breeding and vile actions. Blame whites. Promote more. Blame whites. Whoops, there aren't any whites left.
**********
Almost any time someone in the mass media claims a perceived opponent says, wants or believes something, the mass media claim will be a straw person.
Almost any time some one in the mass media tries to demonize someone by quibbling with a few minor claims, especially statistics, it will be a massive straw person. Politically unpopular writers will often publish books with thousands of claims and statistics. Some critic in the mass media will look for the few errors and try to demonize the author.
**********
Wall Street gives Barack Obama a 17 percent approval rating despite the fact that Obama helped Wall Street at the expense of ordinary citizens.
The pro-Wall Street Congress has an eight percent approval rating.
Friday, January 22, 2016
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Freedom of Secession Association
Twenty-four percent of respondents to a 2014 Reuters poll support secession for their state.
But, oddly, there isn't a single decent website on secession. You would think for a topic so momentous, sites would proliferate.
Secessions should happen but not at the state level. The empire split in two model will fail also. You end up with the same totalitarianisms--blue states controlled by third wayism, red states controlled by neoconservatism.
But wouldn't the blue states become more progressive and the red states more alternative right?
Not likely.
Blue states would attract Libertarians, secular neoconservatives, nonwhite migrants, and others devoted to free riding and ruling group totalitarianisms, yet turned off by Christian neoconservatism. You end up with a hell run by the likes of David Brooks, Patri Friedman, Haim Saban, Reza Aslan, Prince Bandar, Al Sharpton, Joe Lieberman, and Louis Farrakhan.
Red states would attract multicultural, neoconservative pro-lifers. Pro-lifers consider abortion more important than other issues combined. Research suggests that pro-lifers who converted from Democratic to Republican over the past couple decades simply ditched their previous views on other issues, that is, they converted to Christian neoconservatism. You end up with a dystopia run by the likes of Rick Perry, Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, and Sheldon Adelson.
Any good split must create dozens of new nation-states, one each for Third Wayers, Libertarians, religious neoconservatives, secular neoconservatives, conservative ethnoracial fact facers, nonconservative ethnoracial fact facers, black secessioners, Hispanic secessioners, to name a few.
The first key for fact facers is ending dysgenic trends and reintroducing eugenics. The second key is good laws that fight free riding (rent seeking), plus citizens moving heaven and Earth to make sure those laws are enforced.
Present empires and crypto colonial states will eventually break apart or become more dystopian simply due to ever increasing dysgenic breeding and free riding. Groups of ethical, reciprocal altruists prosper when they separate. If groups don't separate, creeping evolutionary and psychological egoism result. Reciprocal altruism exists now because the ancestors of today's reciprocal altruists split from tribes that became increasingly dominated by egoism and tyranny. And they kept on splitting, usually with their kin and their kins' genes for reciprocal altruism.
Now that (some) humans understand reason and evolution better, some splinter groups should consciously direct their evolutions, to keep free riding in check, potentially preventing the costs of splitting.
But contemporary groups dominated by egoism and Machiavellianism use technology to try to lock in dystopian societies with servant altruistic classes and ruling groups devoted to egoism--as we see today today with ruling groups using the electronic mass media for an onslaught of despicable rhetorical tricks.
Be careful what you support. You could end up worse.
But, oddly, there isn't a single decent website on secession. You would think for a topic so momentous, sites would proliferate.
Secessions should happen but not at the state level. The empire split in two model will fail also. You end up with the same totalitarianisms--blue states controlled by third wayism, red states controlled by neoconservatism.
But wouldn't the blue states become more progressive and the red states more alternative right?
Not likely.
Blue states would attract Libertarians, secular neoconservatives, nonwhite migrants, and others devoted to free riding and ruling group totalitarianisms, yet turned off by Christian neoconservatism. You end up with a hell run by the likes of David Brooks, Patri Friedman, Haim Saban, Reza Aslan, Prince Bandar, Al Sharpton, Joe Lieberman, and Louis Farrakhan.
Red states would attract multicultural, neoconservative pro-lifers. Pro-lifers consider abortion more important than other issues combined. Research suggests that pro-lifers who converted from Democratic to Republican over the past couple decades simply ditched their previous views on other issues, that is, they converted to Christian neoconservatism. You end up with a dystopia run by the likes of Rick Perry, Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, and Sheldon Adelson.
Any good split must create dozens of new nation-states, one each for Third Wayers, Libertarians, religious neoconservatives, secular neoconservatives, conservative ethnoracial fact facers, nonconservative ethnoracial fact facers, black secessioners, Hispanic secessioners, to name a few.
The first key for fact facers is ending dysgenic trends and reintroducing eugenics. The second key is good laws that fight free riding (rent seeking), plus citizens moving heaven and Earth to make sure those laws are enforced.
Present empires and crypto colonial states will eventually break apart or become more dystopian simply due to ever increasing dysgenic breeding and free riding. Groups of ethical, reciprocal altruists prosper when they separate. If groups don't separate, creeping evolutionary and psychological egoism result. Reciprocal altruism exists now because the ancestors of today's reciprocal altruists split from tribes that became increasingly dominated by egoism and tyranny. And they kept on splitting, usually with their kin and their kins' genes for reciprocal altruism.
Now that (some) humans understand reason and evolution better, some splinter groups should consciously direct their evolutions, to keep free riding in check, potentially preventing the costs of splitting.
But contemporary groups dominated by egoism and Machiavellianism use technology to try to lock in dystopian societies with servant altruistic classes and ruling groups devoted to egoism--as we see today today with ruling groups using the electronic mass media for an onslaught of despicable rhetorical tricks.
Be careful what you support. You could end up worse.
Monday, January 18, 2016
Winning Hearts and Darts from Non-Westerners
One little noted feature of Western self-destruction is the refusal of almost everyone in the ruling groups to verbally defend the West, not to mention their unwillingness to defend Western individuals.
Sure, they'll promote Islam, Randism, globalism, neoconservatism, third wayism, and cultural Marxism, but those are anti-Western beliefs.
Leaders won't stand up against cultural Marxism and say billions of non-Westerners owe their existences to Western science, technology, and generosity. Instead, leaders join the irrelevant, anti-Western, ontological guilt train. Why did Swedes acquiesce when Jesse Jackson hectored them with fallacious, genocidal rhetoric?
China prattles on about its "century of humiliation." Western leader dare not challenge the multicultural narratives. No leader mentions that Imperial China was a totalitarian, Malthusian hell. Females had their feet bound. Almost any Chinese man could be murdered for almost any reason, including having the wrong hair style.
No leader states that the West saved millions of Chinese from enslavement and destruction at the hands of the Japanese in the 1940s, then again from Maoism during the past 40 years.
If Chinese leaders were so great, why did millions of Chinese flee to Western enclaves in Shanghai and Hong Kong?
Russian leaders continue to play their victim games without mentioning the centuries of invasions and subjugations Russian leaders and the Soviet Union engaged in. Russia didn't become the world's largest country by accident or free association.
The supporters of globalism, neoconservatism, and third Wayism, who despise us as they rule us, want us to pivot to Asia and Russia, to intensify conflict with Chinese and Russian supporters of globalism and multiculturalism, who also despise us. This is not our fight. This is battle of egoism versus egoism among the global rich. No one in China, Russia, and the West should obey the military prescriptions of the ruling groups.
Multiculturalists tell us the mass slaughter of the American Civil War was necessary to end the evil of slavery in America, but fail to mention the far more brutal slavery and tribal wars practiced by Amerindians prior to the arrival of Westerners. Nor do they pay attention to today's slavery, often allying themselves with those spreading forced labor.
Barack Obama tells us the former United States is “one of the biggest Muslim nations” and thanks Muslims for "building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”
Right.
Thanks for stealth jihad, the police states, and all the legalized bribery on behalf of OPEC.
Western leaders have been disasters. Their egoism and groupthink bring continuing ruin. And nonwealthy Western individuals are starting to run low on available ruin.
Sure, they'll promote Islam, Randism, globalism, neoconservatism, third wayism, and cultural Marxism, but those are anti-Western beliefs.
Leaders won't stand up against cultural Marxism and say billions of non-Westerners owe their existences to Western science, technology, and generosity. Instead, leaders join the irrelevant, anti-Western, ontological guilt train. Why did Swedes acquiesce when Jesse Jackson hectored them with fallacious, genocidal rhetoric?
China prattles on about its "century of humiliation." Western leader dare not challenge the multicultural narratives. No leader mentions that Imperial China was a totalitarian, Malthusian hell. Females had their feet bound. Almost any Chinese man could be murdered for almost any reason, including having the wrong hair style.
No leader states that the West saved millions of Chinese from enslavement and destruction at the hands of the Japanese in the 1940s, then again from Maoism during the past 40 years.
If Chinese leaders were so great, why did millions of Chinese flee to Western enclaves in Shanghai and Hong Kong?
Russian leaders continue to play their victim games without mentioning the centuries of invasions and subjugations Russian leaders and the Soviet Union engaged in. Russia didn't become the world's largest country by accident or free association.
The supporters of globalism, neoconservatism, and third Wayism, who despise us as they rule us, want us to pivot to Asia and Russia, to intensify conflict with Chinese and Russian supporters of globalism and multiculturalism, who also despise us. This is not our fight. This is battle of egoism versus egoism among the global rich. No one in China, Russia, and the West should obey the military prescriptions of the ruling groups.
Multiculturalists tell us the mass slaughter of the American Civil War was necessary to end the evil of slavery in America, but fail to mention the far more brutal slavery and tribal wars practiced by Amerindians prior to the arrival of Westerners. Nor do they pay attention to today's slavery, often allying themselves with those spreading forced labor.
Barack Obama tells us the former United States is “one of the biggest Muslim nations” and thanks Muslims for "building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.”
Right.
Thanks for stealth jihad, the police states, and all the legalized bribery on behalf of OPEC.
Western leaders have been disasters. Their egoism and groupthink bring continuing ruin. And nonwealthy Western individuals are starting to run low on available ruin.
The Cons of a Big Con
Beliefs and actions common among various forms of Marxism from Stalinism to multiculturalism (and a few other ideologies as well):
The cause matters more than the humans affected by the ideology, especially when both the means and ends are evil. Ideology and rage at perceived opponents suffice as substitute opiates of the masses. Critics get accused of anti-intellectualism despite the blatantly poorly reasoned arguments of the cause.
Free speech is for Marxian leaders or followers only.
The atrocious results of Marxism must some how have whites or opponents as the most important causes. Good things must have Marxism or nonwhites as the causes, for example, the cottage industry devoted to overstating the scientific contributions of Muslims.
Believers think triumph is inevitable, life will magically get better once whites or other opponents are gone. Counter evidence gets ignored, dismissed, distorted or demonized. Contradictions gets noted in the actions of opponents, not within Marxism. If it makes Marxian leaders feel good, others must imagine it is good. Cognitive dissonance is for whites and opponents. Moral facts (those from HBD writers, for example) must be made to appear as shameful, unthinkable thoughts. Believers should feel guilty only for not fighting correctly for the cause.
Military means mix with "boring from within" and the "the long march through the institutions." Once institutions are taken, believers bombard individuals with slurs, small sample fallacies, straw person attacks, and other fallacies. Believers act as if repeating fallacies turns fallacies into facts.
Instead of accurately developing and weighing arguments, followers focus on finding the most effective talking points to intimidate or manipulate.
Gurus get worshipped, especially those spewing pseudo profound jargon.
Rulers sow confusion, alienation among enemies. When behaviors of Marxian leaders become too evil to ignore, the evils must magically be relabeled no-true-Scotsman fallacy style into "conservative," "not Islamic," or "not real Marxism." Followers blame the victims. Rulers practice bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw. They chant the magic buzzwords and catch phrases (equality, diversity, compassion) and watch as opposition melts away. Platitudes and kumbaya activities cover the real goals.
And remember "no enemies to the left."
Followers act as if labeling intuitions and junk research scientific makes the the intuitions and junk research accurate.
The specific economic system is a lower priority, varying from communes, Maoism, Castroism, Stalinism, socialism, to cronyistic contemporary Chinese economics (but the system must follow the rule of from each according to what can be extracted from them, to those toward the top).
The cause matters more than the humans affected by the ideology, especially when both the means and ends are evil. Ideology and rage at perceived opponents suffice as substitute opiates of the masses. Critics get accused of anti-intellectualism despite the blatantly poorly reasoned arguments of the cause.
Free speech is for Marxian leaders or followers only.
The atrocious results of Marxism must some how have whites or opponents as the most important causes. Good things must have Marxism or nonwhites as the causes, for example, the cottage industry devoted to overstating the scientific contributions of Muslims.
Believers think triumph is inevitable, life will magically get better once whites or other opponents are gone. Counter evidence gets ignored, dismissed, distorted or demonized. Contradictions gets noted in the actions of opponents, not within Marxism. If it makes Marxian leaders feel good, others must imagine it is good. Cognitive dissonance is for whites and opponents. Moral facts (those from HBD writers, for example) must be made to appear as shameful, unthinkable thoughts. Believers should feel guilty only for not fighting correctly for the cause.
Military means mix with "boring from within" and the "the long march through the institutions." Once institutions are taken, believers bombard individuals with slurs, small sample fallacies, straw person attacks, and other fallacies. Believers act as if repeating fallacies turns fallacies into facts.
Instead of accurately developing and weighing arguments, followers focus on finding the most effective talking points to intimidate or manipulate.
Gurus get worshipped, especially those spewing pseudo profound jargon.
Rulers sow confusion, alienation among enemies. When behaviors of Marxian leaders become too evil to ignore, the evils must magically be relabeled no-true-Scotsman fallacy style into "conservative," "not Islamic," or "not real Marxism." Followers blame the victims. Rulers practice bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw. They chant the magic buzzwords and catch phrases (equality, diversity, compassion) and watch as opposition melts away. Platitudes and kumbaya activities cover the real goals.
And remember "no enemies to the left."
Followers act as if labeling intuitions and junk research scientific makes the the intuitions and junk research accurate.
The specific economic system is a lower priority, varying from communes, Maoism, Castroism, Stalinism, socialism, to cronyistic contemporary Chinese economics (but the system must follow the rule of from each according to what can be extracted from them, to those toward the top).
Sunday, January 17, 2016
Found an Old Note to Myself
In July 2011, I Googled the following phrases:
"Sociology of terrorism" (14,600 Google results)
"Sociology of Sharia" (three results: first, a pro Sharia "social constructionist approach to the study of Sharia," then two copies of incoherent musings at Millatfacebook.com)
"Sociology of dhimmitude" (zero results)
You see the intersection of groupthink, the vividness bias, the garbage values of multiculturalism, and the junk science of sociology.
Priorities.
"Sociology of terrorism" (14,600 Google results)
"Sociology of Sharia" (three results: first, a pro Sharia "social constructionist approach to the study of Sharia," then two copies of incoherent musings at Millatfacebook.com)
"Sociology of dhimmitude" (zero results)
You see the intersection of groupthink, the vividness bias, the garbage values of multiculturalism, and the junk science of sociology.
Priorities.
More Random Thoughts
Differences among multicultural liberal political parties (Green, Labour, Democratic) and multicultural conservative parties (Tory, Republican, Libertarian, Constitution) are largely arguments about how fast to destroy the West and how fast to increase rates of rent seeking from the tops and bottoms, with Libertarians and neoconservatives preferring the most and fastest destruction. The often unstated end is similar for all of them.
The longer we wait to reform the West, the higher the costs to ourselves and future generations. But real reformers have almost no power now. And most Westerners swallowed ruling group propaganda for so long, Westerners have few ideas about what should be done.
As ruling groups steal more power, their promoters emphasize the greatness of thousands of things, except organized nonwealthy citizens, labeling increases in available propaganda or consumer goods democracy while real democracy flounders, claiming we have bio wiring for what benefits them, but no wiring for what HBD discovers. Ruling groups call activities and technologies that indoctrinate or kill time healthy or educational. Instead of talking about moral beings, they talk about whatever slurs they can attach to nonwealthy individuals.
Some people who describe borders as arbitrary or pointless, nevertheless think this or that actor or sports team is ethically superior and worthy of support, though doing so is trillions of times more arbitrary and pointless.
The longer we wait to reform the West, the higher the costs to ourselves and future generations. But real reformers have almost no power now. And most Westerners swallowed ruling group propaganda for so long, Westerners have few ideas about what should be done.
As ruling groups steal more power, their promoters emphasize the greatness of thousands of things, except organized nonwealthy citizens, labeling increases in available propaganda or consumer goods democracy while real democracy flounders, claiming we have bio wiring for what benefits them, but no wiring for what HBD discovers. Ruling groups call activities and technologies that indoctrinate or kill time healthy or educational. Instead of talking about moral beings, they talk about whatever slurs they can attach to nonwealthy individuals.
No one should let even the most wonderful of Muslims into their land, including diplomats. The children of these wonderful Muslims will behave according to genes and and non parental environments that the wonderful Muslims have little control over. And if they are so wonderful, they wouldn't be Muslim to begin with.
If you don't consciously make massive improvements to your environments and keep making them, you will end up surprised at how easily destructive elements insert themselves into your life.
The Consumer price Index is a faulty measure of inflation and living standards. The government admits that the CPI does not measure living standards. Home productivity (self-cleaning, home-cooked meals, etc.) plummeted during the past generation. The CPI measures quality improvements, but fails to accurately measure the ways new products are new and worse. Switching from incandescent bulbs to fluorescent bulbs, for example, causes sleep disorders because of blue wavelengths in fluorescent lighting. Antibiotics continue to lose effectiveness. Quality improvements were greater during the 1945 to 1973 period. Growth during that period was more likely understated than in recent decades. The total fertility rate at the peak of the baby boom roughly doubled the current total fertility rate. Comparing the number of toys adults have now versus then does not help. Parents had less money for toys in the 1960s because they had many children to support. Individuals had much less destructive diversity around them.
Many individuals push gun bans, not because of the bans objective merit, but because:
- they have been baited into it
- doing so makes them feel good about themselves without them having to do much good
- vividness bias
- doing so helps the divide-and-screw agendas.
- all of the above
Some people who describe borders as arbitrary or pointless, nevertheless think this or that actor or sports team is ethically superior and worthy of support, though doing so is trillions of times more arbitrary and pointless.
Saturday, January 16, 2016
Screwing People Over
A field of knowledge consists of many accurate, well understood ideas within that area. If a ten-year-old memorized an accurate article about astronomy, she would not be knowledgeable in that field because knowledge requires a huge number of accurate, well-understood ideas.
Trump gets criticized for not knowing politics and policy issues. And they're right.
The problem is that almost all other ruling group Western politicians have similar flaws. Their knowledge consists of how to screw people over, call it the political SPO field. These politicians have little knowledge of logic, ethics, and policy reforms. If you asked most ruling group politicians what Pigouvian taxes we should enact, their answers wouldn't be close to right, many wouldn't know the meaning of the word Pigouvian.
Ruling group politicians know thousands of leaders, lobbyists, diplomats, and advisors. They memorized thousands of talking points. But the talking points are either fallacious or intended as bait-and-switch morsels. They have political SPO knowledge, but not ethical and policy knowledge. Politicians are altruistic toward their friends and relatives, at the expense of the people. But since they are devoted to egoism, politicians easily believe helping allies is the same as doing their duties for the people.
Most people become national politicians because they want more power, status, and money, no matter what they claim their ethical motives are. In evolutionary terms, this is called psychological egoism.
Trump also has SPO knowledge from business fields, note his ability to have his corporations file for bankruptcy without his own wealth being destroyed. Trump's egoism is well documented.
That's why a random person walking down the street would likely be a better president than most billionaires or national politicians. The random person is less likely to be devoted to egoism. The professional politician will parrot or come up with all sorts of SPO schemes and fallacious rhetoric to support the schemes. Often Congressional bills will be written by lobbyists.
The random person turned politician might just say no to many such schemes, realizing what is at work.
We are now subjected to a plethora of poorly reasoned "As a lifelong Republican..." articles warning us about Trump, the fake centrism on full display. Being a lifelong Green, Republican, Democrat or Libertarian does not make one an expert. If anything, it makes one guilty. These authors would rather vote for a totalitarianism that starts a super war with China or Russia than anyone who opposes the invasion and annihilation of the West by migrants. These lifelong articles contrast Trump with the disastrous presidency of Reagan. The authors assume readers will be unaware of Reagan's real record, the over 30 percent decline of median incomes in young families with children during the 1980s, despite massive increases in wives working. Instead, the fairy tale emphasizes winning the Cold War and the Reagan boom, nevermind that the West lost the Cold War and boom was only for the wealthy.
You might as well vote for yourself rather than anyone the ruling group political parties offer.
Trump gets criticized for not knowing politics and policy issues. And they're right.
The problem is that almost all other ruling group Western politicians have similar flaws. Their knowledge consists of how to screw people over, call it the political SPO field. These politicians have little knowledge of logic, ethics, and policy reforms. If you asked most ruling group politicians what Pigouvian taxes we should enact, their answers wouldn't be close to right, many wouldn't know the meaning of the word Pigouvian.
Ruling group politicians know thousands of leaders, lobbyists, diplomats, and advisors. They memorized thousands of talking points. But the talking points are either fallacious or intended as bait-and-switch morsels. They have political SPO knowledge, but not ethical and policy knowledge. Politicians are altruistic toward their friends and relatives, at the expense of the people. But since they are devoted to egoism, politicians easily believe helping allies is the same as doing their duties for the people.
Most people become national politicians because they want more power, status, and money, no matter what they claim their ethical motives are. In evolutionary terms, this is called psychological egoism.
Trump also has SPO knowledge from business fields, note his ability to have his corporations file for bankruptcy without his own wealth being destroyed. Trump's egoism is well documented.
That's why a random person walking down the street would likely be a better president than most billionaires or national politicians. The random person is less likely to be devoted to egoism. The professional politician will parrot or come up with all sorts of SPO schemes and fallacious rhetoric to support the schemes. Often Congressional bills will be written by lobbyists.
The random person turned politician might just say no to many such schemes, realizing what is at work.
We are now subjected to a plethora of poorly reasoned "As a lifelong Republican..." articles warning us about Trump, the fake centrism on full display. Being a lifelong Green, Republican, Democrat or Libertarian does not make one an expert. If anything, it makes one guilty. These authors would rather vote for a totalitarianism that starts a super war with China or Russia than anyone who opposes the invasion and annihilation of the West by migrants. These lifelong articles contrast Trump with the disastrous presidency of Reagan. The authors assume readers will be unaware of Reagan's real record, the over 30 percent decline of median incomes in young families with children during the 1980s, despite massive increases in wives working. Instead, the fairy tale emphasizes winning the Cold War and the Reagan boom, nevermind that the West lost the Cold War and boom was only for the wealthy.
You might as well vote for yourself rather than anyone the ruling group political parties offer.
The Media and Me
There's no ethical reason to financially support Hollywood or browse any mass media website. Almost everything politics related that mass media sources publish is poorly reasoned propaganda. On the few occasions they publish something worthwhile, better websites will have it or link to it.
The current mass media have no ethical right to be mass media. They have stolen the electromagnetic spectrum, the rightful property of the people. In other words, they are using the property of the people to demonize the people and trick the people into paying for their own demonization. The mass media are over interested in making money and over invested in pushing the agendas of individuals devoted to egoism and mass destruction.
They have no right to our time or money.
I can't think of a single major celebrity I admire. There is not a single one I think of as more deserving of respect than random persons walking down the street. It feels good to not be on the celebrity worship train. I would not pay a dime to have my photo taken with any of them.
The current mass media have no ethical right to be mass media. They have stolen the electromagnetic spectrum, the rightful property of the people. In other words, they are using the property of the people to demonize the people and trick the people into paying for their own demonization. The mass media are over interested in making money and over invested in pushing the agendas of individuals devoted to egoism and mass destruction.
They have no right to our time or money.
I can't think of a single major celebrity I admire. There is not a single one I think of as more deserving of respect than random persons walking down the street. It feels good to not be on the celebrity worship train. I would not pay a dime to have my photo taken with any of them.
Friday, January 15, 2016
Random Thoughts
The larger the society, the more likely rituals and ceremonies will seem a joke, the more likely elites will use rituals and ceremonies to control and harm ordinary individuals.
Most of us do not know what it like to live in cultures where most moments are opportunities for moral creation. Our societies dedicate themselves to dreading the good, what some call the demoniacal, a mixture of shallowness, indifference, laziness, escapism, self-absorption, and a reflexive dread of good acts.
Complete rejection by ruling groups who seek to destroy us is exhilarating.
Both tribalism and the current editions the nation states are disasters, the cartels of totalitarianism.
The doctrine that if the president does it, it is not illegal is support for a dictatorship. A president could, after all, declare herself president for life, then declare it not illegal. And, of course, it would be legal for the president to be a mass murderer. Even benign dictatorships produce destruction. In the long run, benign dictators die. “Long live the king” was not an empty line. It expressed a not unreasonable fear that the next king would be worse.
********
Global warming has the benefit of mitigating the mass destruction caused by super volcano winters.
********
The use of terrorism as a bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw wedge issue by the ruling groups is bad enough now. Imagine how bad it will get if terrorism sky rockets or new totalitarian technologies emerge.
**********
Conversation I overheard at the library yesterday:
A woman asked a librarian for books on counterfeiting. During the search, the librarian (surprisingly) asked the woman why she wanted such books. The woman started hemming and hawing for an awkwardly long time, then said, "For a class... (more hemming and hawing). I'm studying to be a cop."
**********
Thought experiment: Let's imagine a world where white and Asian women were hideous, worse than any other women on the planet, worse looking than hyenas. Let's imagine white men being sexually aggressive, looking to impregnate every woman they could. How would that change present political dynamics?
***********
Many individuals fight off existential anxieties with hate, especially multiculturalists unaware of their own motives, who find feelings of purpose and superiority by hating whites.
**********
Establishment Western political parties have one job that ethically matters more than almost all others. Prevent demographic invasion, conquest, and subjugation. And none of them do it.
**********
Read publications promoting communism from two or three generations ago. Some of them are stored on Ron Unz's archive of magazines. Many of today's multicultural writings paraphrase the biocultural arguments of communism. So, yes, multiculturalism is cultural Marxism. And, yes, Stalin, Mao, Mugabe, and Kim Jong Il were spewing multicultural nostrums.
**********
Suppose donating money to corrupt charities makes one feel good? What if the charities cause the spread of lower activity variants of the MAOA gene, the variants that causes aggression? What if millions of individuals get murdered 70 years from now thanks to that charity?
**********
What do women want? What do men want? Within specific genetic and environmental limitations, men and women want what their genes and societies tell them is cool to want. But men and women don't want to think genes and societies influence over themselves. Men and Women want to think they are unique or rebels. When the driver blasting music pulls up next to you, he wants you to think, "Wow. That guy has great taste in music. He's awesome." But almost no one actually thinks that. The music is off putting unless tastes match.
**********
To the multiculturalist, the awareness of self-contradictions seems not to exist--and the multicultural media do not point them out. Maybe multiculturalists heard Bobcat Goldthwaite make a contradiction joke about gated communities a few decades ago, but that was just a joke, right? Bobcat's joke was quickly replaced by tons of other infotainment.
**********
Instant realization: I have never heard the speaking voices of nearly everyone in today's Congress. The exceptions: Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Marco Rubio, and John McCain. Man, I love not watching TV.
**********
Nationalism by whites in Britain, France, Greece, Poland, America, and elsewhere saved the the world from Nazism, communism, Islam, and dozens of other evil ideologies and invasions, so before we condemn all nationalism by whites, realize the good. Without nationalistic whites all the advances in medicine and agriculture that saved billions of lives would not have happened.
**********
Overheard:
Protestant Filipina: Your [Catholic] church got damaged [by an earthquake]. Our house [protestant church] was protected by God.
(at work)
First Man: Throughout history great thinkers have known that certain books contain codes. Newton--
Second Man: Yeah, the The DaVinci Code.
First Man: No, not The Davinci Code. Newton, Einstein--
Second Man: That's the DaVinci Code.
(at Cabela's)
First Man: I came home [from a business trip] and one of them [migrants] was sleeping in my bed. I was shaking.
Second Man: I don't worry about that. Jesus protects me.
First Man: You don't believe that shit, do you?
Second Man: It helps me. It's gotten me through a lot of stuff. I keep my Bible in my truck, right next to me. It stays right there, protecting me. I haven't had to slam on my breaks ever since I put it there.
Hip Hop Recording Engineer: If you could see what I see. I record a lot of songs that could change the world. But the record companies don't want all that. Sometimes they allow one or two political songs. Sometimes I record 20 tracks, ten will be revolutionary. But the record company will allow only one revolutionary song. Sometimes not even that.
Man: Kill all the whites.
Wealthy Filipina: You don't understand. Ordinary Filipinos are b*cteria. They pretend to be simple and humble to trick you. They're like that. They're always looking for some way to trick you. They know all the tricks because they see the tricks all around them. They always want something for nothing. Even when they work: you hire one to fix your door. You come home. The door's all crooked and broken. Worse than before. And they demand to be paid. You just observe. You'll see.
Man: Really?
Wealthy Filipina: Don't get involved with b*cteria. Once they latch on, you lose.
**********
Battles among Western ruling groups with ISIS and similar groups involve unstated disagreements about slow jihad versus fast jihad. The Western establishments prefer to destroy the West slowly by migrant invasions. Fast jihad messes with the plan, arousing the concern of ordinary Westerners. Establishments prefer to keep the conquests and destructions unnoticed until too late.
Most of us do not know what it like to live in cultures where most moments are opportunities for moral creation. Our societies dedicate themselves to dreading the good, what some call the demoniacal, a mixture of shallowness, indifference, laziness, escapism, self-absorption, and a reflexive dread of good acts.
Both tribalism and the current editions the nation states are disasters, the cartels of totalitarianism.
********
Global warming has the benefit of mitigating the mass destruction caused by super volcano winters.
********
The use of terrorism as a bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw wedge issue by the ruling groups is bad enough now. Imagine how bad it will get if terrorism sky rockets or new totalitarian technologies emerge.
**********
Conversation I overheard at the library yesterday:
A woman asked a librarian for books on counterfeiting. During the search, the librarian (surprisingly) asked the woman why she wanted such books. The woman started hemming and hawing for an awkwardly long time, then said, "For a class... (more hemming and hawing). I'm studying to be a cop."
**********
Thought experiment: Let's imagine a world where white and Asian women were hideous, worse than any other women on the planet, worse looking than hyenas. Let's imagine white men being sexually aggressive, looking to impregnate every woman they could. How would that change present political dynamics?
***********
Many individuals fight off existential anxieties with hate, especially multiculturalists unaware of their own motives, who find feelings of purpose and superiority by hating whites.
**********
Establishment Western political parties have one job that ethically matters more than almost all others. Prevent demographic invasion, conquest, and subjugation. And none of them do it.
**********
Read publications promoting communism from two or three generations ago. Some of them are stored on Ron Unz's archive of magazines. Many of today's multicultural writings paraphrase the biocultural arguments of communism. So, yes, multiculturalism is cultural Marxism. And, yes, Stalin, Mao, Mugabe, and Kim Jong Il were spewing multicultural nostrums.
**********
Suppose donating money to corrupt charities makes one feel good? What if the charities cause the spread of lower activity variants of the MAOA gene, the variants that causes aggression? What if millions of individuals get murdered 70 years from now thanks to that charity?
**********
What do women want? What do men want? Within specific genetic and environmental limitations, men and women want what their genes and societies tell them is cool to want. But men and women don't want to think genes and societies influence over themselves. Men and Women want to think they are unique or rebels. When the driver blasting music pulls up next to you, he wants you to think, "Wow. That guy has great taste in music. He's awesome." But almost no one actually thinks that. The music is off putting unless tastes match.
**********
To the multiculturalist, the awareness of self-contradictions seems not to exist--and the multicultural media do not point them out. Maybe multiculturalists heard Bobcat Goldthwaite make a contradiction joke about gated communities a few decades ago, but that was just a joke, right? Bobcat's joke was quickly replaced by tons of other infotainment.
**********
Instant realization: I have never heard the speaking voices of nearly everyone in today's Congress. The exceptions: Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Marco Rubio, and John McCain. Man, I love not watching TV.
**********
Nationalism by whites in Britain, France, Greece, Poland, America, and elsewhere saved the the world from Nazism, communism, Islam, and dozens of other evil ideologies and invasions, so before we condemn all nationalism by whites, realize the good. Without nationalistic whites all the advances in medicine and agriculture that saved billions of lives would not have happened.
**********
Overheard:
Protestant Filipina: Your [Catholic] church got damaged [by an earthquake]. Our house [protestant church] was protected by God.
(at work)
First Man: Throughout history great thinkers have known that certain books contain codes. Newton--
Second Man: Yeah, the The DaVinci Code.
First Man: No, not The Davinci Code. Newton, Einstein--
Second Man: That's the DaVinci Code.
(at Cabela's)
First Man: I came home [from a business trip] and one of them [migrants] was sleeping in my bed. I was shaking.
Second Man: I don't worry about that. Jesus protects me.
First Man: You don't believe that shit, do you?
Second Man: It helps me. It's gotten me through a lot of stuff. I keep my Bible in my truck, right next to me. It stays right there, protecting me. I haven't had to slam on my breaks ever since I put it there.
Hip Hop Recording Engineer: If you could see what I see. I record a lot of songs that could change the world. But the record companies don't want all that. Sometimes they allow one or two political songs. Sometimes I record 20 tracks, ten will be revolutionary. But the record company will allow only one revolutionary song. Sometimes not even that.
Man: Kill all the whites.
Wealthy Filipina: You don't understand. Ordinary Filipinos are b*cteria. They pretend to be simple and humble to trick you. They're like that. They're always looking for some way to trick you. They know all the tricks because they see the tricks all around them. They always want something for nothing. Even when they work: you hire one to fix your door. You come home. The door's all crooked and broken. Worse than before. And they demand to be paid. You just observe. You'll see.
Man: Really?
Wealthy Filipina: Don't get involved with b*cteria. Once they latch on, you lose.
Battles among Western ruling groups with ISIS and similar groups involve unstated disagreements about slow jihad versus fast jihad. The Western establishments prefer to destroy the West slowly by migrant invasions. Fast jihad messes with the plan, arousing the concern of ordinary Westerners. Establishments prefer to keep the conquests and destructions unnoticed until too late.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)