One added bonus of spending thousands of hours weighing evidence, including ethnoracial evidence, is that you begin to see facts that few others have the slightest inkling about.
That Extra Eye can look at various international relations schools of thought, dozens of them, from neorealist to feminist, and see something immediately: the schools are almost all variants of biocultural Marxism.
The ethnoracial fact facer knows that contemporary rulers are not acting on nationalism or national interest as some foreign policy types presume. Rulers are acting on egoism, groupthink, xenocentrism, and other bad motives. The budding young IR student might look at all those IR variants taught at prestigious universities and come to the conclusion that those schools offer all the ways of thinking, the sacred canon. In reality, IR schools are (mostly) collections of BS, as are most of the humanities and social sciences.
A Third Way Democrat will look at this article by Jon Chait and think he sees pure genius, an accurate representation of the world. A fact facer would immediately note that almost every sentence in Chait's article contains a fallacy--ad hominems, straw persons, false claims, small samples, appeals to tradition among them. (Note that I am not endorsing Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio. Those two politicians are wrong about almost everything important.)
The same goes for millions of other arguments produced by ruling groups.
The fact facer can look at a social science study and think of many omitted confounding factors, especially genetic factors, plus other reasoning errors that make the study probable rubbish,
Fact facers gain an almost encyclopedic awareness of contradictions. How could they not? Biocultural Marxism and other ruling group ideologies contain contradictions by the millions.
Most people go through their lives believing certain political thoughts are taboo, no matter how well supported those ideas are by evidence, especially those who imagine themselves to be open minded. They rationalize. The're not even half conscious of their rationalizations. They experience shame or other anxieties for even thinking taboo political thoughts, not because of the evidence, but because of indoctrination and social pressures. They attack the motives of taboo breakers as if ad hominem attacks will make the facts change.
The fact facer doesn't care. She has already decided to follow the evidence, whether ideas are taboo or not. Adding more taboo ideas to existing beliefs is no big deal to the fact facer. If you already faced the fact that nonwhite immigration is unethical, you might as well face taboo facts about eugenics and thousands of other issues, too.
Someone once said blacks know extra things about whites because blacks gain the perspective of being outsiders peering at whites.
Let me tell you, fact facers know thousands of facts about whites, nonwhites, and ruling groups that most people don't have the slightest idea about.
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
The Passion of the Crestfallen
I made the mistake of reading Rod Dreher, a writer at the American Conservative.
Correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't spent much time reading Dreher's work, but Dreher's shtick consists of complaining that multiculturalists mistreat white, Christian multiculturalists like himself.
Golly.
You mean to tell me that multiculturalists, devoted to antiwhite totalitarianism, act badly toward white, Christian multiculturalists?
I'm shocked.
How could multiculturalists not respond with kindness at the displays of altruism and obsequiousness exhibited by white, Christian multiculturalists? It's as if the white, Christian multiculturalists are thinking, "Hey, Guys. What are you doing? We're on the same antiwhite team," as if nonwhites have genetic and cultural tendencies that differ from whites, but don't tell that to the new American Conservative. It's been awhile since Steve Sailor pointed out a few unpopular truths at the American Conservative.
Dreher proposes the Benedict Option, that is, Christians retreating from societies, spending much time in prayer.
But, of course, there is no evidence that any God ever answered any prayer. Almost nobody remembers the Gods of the peoples wiped off the face of the earth, nor the peoples themselves. The Thule peoples once dominated the arctic for thousands of miles. Where are the Thule peoples and their Gods now? Nowhere. Exterminated by Inuits. The Inuits didn't even bother to breed with captured Thule females, or if Inuits did so, they slaughtered or sterilized resulting offspring. White Christians should realize that without white people you can kiss ethical Christianity goodbye. If a Christian God who judges up death exists, what would it do with white, multicultural Christians responsible for the destruction of Christianity and the white individuals?
The Benedict Option reeks of antiwhite fatalism, selfishness, and antinomianism.
I hope I don't make the Dreher mistake again.
Correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't spent much time reading Dreher's work, but Dreher's shtick consists of complaining that multiculturalists mistreat white, Christian multiculturalists like himself.
Golly.
You mean to tell me that multiculturalists, devoted to antiwhite totalitarianism, act badly toward white, Christian multiculturalists?
I'm shocked.
How could multiculturalists not respond with kindness at the displays of altruism and obsequiousness exhibited by white, Christian multiculturalists? It's as if the white, Christian multiculturalists are thinking, "Hey, Guys. What are you doing? We're on the same antiwhite team," as if nonwhites have genetic and cultural tendencies that differ from whites, but don't tell that to the new American Conservative. It's been awhile since Steve Sailor pointed out a few unpopular truths at the American Conservative.
Dreher proposes the Benedict Option, that is, Christians retreating from societies, spending much time in prayer.
But, of course, there is no evidence that any God ever answered any prayer. Almost nobody remembers the Gods of the peoples wiped off the face of the earth, nor the peoples themselves. The Thule peoples once dominated the arctic for thousands of miles. Where are the Thule peoples and their Gods now? Nowhere. Exterminated by Inuits. The Inuits didn't even bother to breed with captured Thule females, or if Inuits did so, they slaughtered or sterilized resulting offspring. White Christians should realize that without white people you can kiss ethical Christianity goodbye. If a Christian God who judges up death exists, what would it do with white, multicultural Christians responsible for the destruction of Christianity and the white individuals?
The Benedict Option reeks of antiwhite fatalism, selfishness, and antinomianism.
I hope I don't make the Dreher mistake again.
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
Support Draconian Hate Crime Laws for Whites Who Violently Attack Nonwhites
Seriously.
Whites who attack nonwhites rank among our worst enemies. Such Whites become national news and small sample fallacy focal points for bashing the rest of us.
Meanwhile, nonwhites who attack whites become no news or local news. Or, perversely, additional fodder for excoriating whites. In multicultural thinking, nonwhite aggression wouldn't have occurred if it weren't for white r*cism or white privilege or some other victim blaming malarky. Mumia Abu Jamal and similar individuals become martyrs, no matter how atrocious their motives. Egalitarians act as if nonwhites lack moral agency. The fanaticism of most multiculturalists is impenetrable by unwanted, well reasoned moral arguments. As we have seen, multicultural media types are fantastic at manufacturing mythological, one sided narratives.
Pretending to be ethnoracially blind makes matters worse. Nonwhites see it as a sign you don't care about the truth, that you are easy to manipulate and intimidate.
Aggression is no help. Whites have ethical duties to organize and form their own communities. Aggression is the rotten solution of indolence, impulsiveness, dysgenic breeding, and high, unstable self-esteem.
There is no going back. There is little of the historical United States of America left. There is the land mass that was once America.
New constitutions must be designed. The old constitution, combined with dysgenics and cultural rot, was not enough to protect us.
Westerners and Western Civilization can be saved and reformed but not with aggressive acts or poorly reasoned devotion to the unethical entities of the past.
Whites who attack nonwhites rank among our worst enemies. Such Whites become national news and small sample fallacy focal points for bashing the rest of us.
Meanwhile, nonwhites who attack whites become no news or local news. Or, perversely, additional fodder for excoriating whites. In multicultural thinking, nonwhite aggression wouldn't have occurred if it weren't for white r*cism or white privilege or some other victim blaming malarky. Mumia Abu Jamal and similar individuals become martyrs, no matter how atrocious their motives. Egalitarians act as if nonwhites lack moral agency. The fanaticism of most multiculturalists is impenetrable by unwanted, well reasoned moral arguments. As we have seen, multicultural media types are fantastic at manufacturing mythological, one sided narratives.
Pretending to be ethnoracially blind makes matters worse. Nonwhites see it as a sign you don't care about the truth, that you are easy to manipulate and intimidate.
Aggression is no help. Whites have ethical duties to organize and form their own communities. Aggression is the rotten solution of indolence, impulsiveness, dysgenic breeding, and high, unstable self-esteem.
There is no going back. There is little of the historical United States of America left. There is the land mass that was once America.
New constitutions must be designed. The old constitution, combined with dysgenics and cultural rot, was not enough to protect us.
Westerners and Western Civilization can be saved and reformed but not with aggressive acts or poorly reasoned devotion to the unethical entities of the past.
Dear Economists
The next time you conduct one of your benefits of nonwhite migration "studies" please include the following costs:
Theft or other acquisition of media, technologies, and institutions by Japanese migrants, leading to the murders of nearly 30 million between 1931 and 1946, plus grievous harms caused to billions of other individuals. More important: the future costs of military technologies stolen by Chinese migrants.
Migrants spreading Marxian ideas, leading the murder of over 90 million and the enslavement of billions.
Totalitarian bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw practices by ruling groups, the near certain result in multicultural societies--wrecking democracy, wrecking pro-worker organizations, ruining political parties, causing general mass destruction.
The demonization of nonwealthy whites by wealthy, ruthless multicultural ruling groups.
Loss of freedom of association.
Massive fifth columning.
Ethnic cleansing of white, working class neighborhoods, loss of property values, costs of moving, costs of competing for slots in decent neighborhoods, costs to working class whites left behind.
Millions of antiwhite rapes and other assaults in schools and prisons not counted in crime stats.
Loss of freedom of speech.
Wrecked ethical environment where moral facts are treated as worthless or evil, where fallacious rubbish is repeated until most of the population believes, where well-reasoned ethnoracial arguments are de facto banned from the mass media, where good points are automatically countered with straw person, ad hominem, and small sample fallacies.
Odious interpersonal environments where various ethnoracial groups groups try to assert their dominance and degrade others.
Massive traffic increases, causing cancer, congestion, cardiovascular disease, wasted hours,
Costs of replacing Western cultures with alienation and fanatical flight to destructive non-Western cultures.
Dysgenic breeding.
Massive legalized bribery by wealthy foreigners and de facto noncitizens.
Affirmative action salary costs and massive costs from inept professionals, especially nonwhite doctors. Public costs of college and college prep educations for migrant groups having IQs in the 80s, leaving them with no degrees, junk degrees or grade inflation degrees in fields they lack proper training for.
Loss of trustworthiness, which is more important than the loss of trust.
Don't forget to include dozens of other costs I forgot to mention here.
Thank you, economists. Your historical devotion to the whole truth softens my heart. I'm sure I'll see the whole truth in your next "study."
Theft or other acquisition of media, technologies, and institutions by Japanese migrants, leading to the murders of nearly 30 million between 1931 and 1946, plus grievous harms caused to billions of other individuals. More important: the future costs of military technologies stolen by Chinese migrants.
Migrants spreading Marxian ideas, leading the murder of over 90 million and the enslavement of billions.
Totalitarian bait-and-switch, divide-and-screw practices by ruling groups, the near certain result in multicultural societies--wrecking democracy, wrecking pro-worker organizations, ruining political parties, causing general mass destruction.
The demonization of nonwealthy whites by wealthy, ruthless multicultural ruling groups.
Loss of freedom of association.
Massive fifth columning.
Ethnic cleansing of white, working class neighborhoods, loss of property values, costs of moving, costs of competing for slots in decent neighborhoods, costs to working class whites left behind.
Millions of antiwhite rapes and other assaults in schools and prisons not counted in crime stats.
Loss of freedom of speech.
Wrecked ethical environment where moral facts are treated as worthless or evil, where fallacious rubbish is repeated until most of the population believes, where well-reasoned ethnoracial arguments are de facto banned from the mass media, where good points are automatically countered with straw person, ad hominem, and small sample fallacies.
Odious interpersonal environments where various ethnoracial groups groups try to assert their dominance and degrade others.
Massive traffic increases, causing cancer, congestion, cardiovascular disease, wasted hours,
Costs of replacing Western cultures with alienation and fanatical flight to destructive non-Western cultures.
Dysgenic breeding.
Massive legalized bribery by wealthy foreigners and de facto noncitizens.
Affirmative action salary costs and massive costs from inept professionals, especially nonwhite doctors. Public costs of college and college prep educations for migrant groups having IQs in the 80s, leaving them with no degrees, junk degrees or grade inflation degrees in fields they lack proper training for.
Loss of trustworthiness, which is more important than the loss of trust.
Don't forget to include dozens of other costs I forgot to mention here.
Thank you, economists. Your historical devotion to the whole truth softens my heart. I'm sure I'll see the whole truth in your next "study."
The Fear Mongering Charade
If you have been following politics recently, you've probably seen plenty of the circumstantial ad hominem "fear mongering," usually directed at those who even slightly oppose cultural Marxism or other establishment nonsense. This farce would be hilarious if the consequences were not so tragic for nonwealthy Westerners. Alleged fear in arguers is, of course, usually irrelevant, as are other emotive states
But the contradictions. Oh, my! For decades, establishment political parties have relied on fear, groupthink, repetition, and media dominance to keep individuals from facing facts, from deviating from the crypto totalitarianisms of Republicanism, and Third Way Democratism.
"Ooga booga. He opposes invasion and annihilation. He must be a r*cist, b*got, and goose st*pper."
So we have the establishments, the same establishments who have been bombarding us with preposterous terror alerts, telling us to be afraid of the moral facts, to freak out about terrorism, but to seldom mention the far more massive threats of egoism, globalism, nihilism, dysgenics, militarism, oligopolies, creeping Sharia, super volcanos, nuclear war, legalized bribery, biological weapons, biocultural Marxism, and one sided mass media.
Those inclined to grandstand offer dire global warming pronouncements when it is still an open question whether global warming is harmful or beneficial. Meanwhile, more important environmental issues (smoking, overfishing, deforestation, overuse of fertilizers, indoor air pollution, outdoor air pollution, antibiotic overuse, overpopulation in poor countries, asbestos in poor countries) get little attention.
(By the way, stop quoting the Pope, celebrities, and natural scientists on public policies. Logic, ethics, and public policies are not their areas of expertise.)
"Ooga booga. Don't use fiscal policies or a trillion dollar platinum coin. The economy is self-correcting."
Of course, the hands off economists are often silent when it comes to the thousands of policies that redistribute money to the top.
We're told to fear whites most of all, despite the fact that individuals from some other ethnoracial groups are many, many times more likely to commit stranger on stranger interracial crimes.
"Ooga booga. White tr*sh. White privilege. White terrorism. Whoops! It's past my bedtime. Let me retire to my mansion that happens to be in a gated community for no reason at all."
I'm so effing sick of establishment egoism, propaganda, contradictions, and gradual mass destruction.
But the contradictions. Oh, my! For decades, establishment political parties have relied on fear, groupthink, repetition, and media dominance to keep individuals from facing facts, from deviating from the crypto totalitarianisms of Republicanism, and Third Way Democratism.
"Ooga booga. He opposes invasion and annihilation. He must be a r*cist, b*got, and goose st*pper."
So we have the establishments, the same establishments who have been bombarding us with preposterous terror alerts, telling us to be afraid of the moral facts, to freak out about terrorism, but to seldom mention the far more massive threats of egoism, globalism, nihilism, dysgenics, militarism, oligopolies, creeping Sharia, super volcanos, nuclear war, legalized bribery, biological weapons, biocultural Marxism, and one sided mass media.
Those inclined to grandstand offer dire global warming pronouncements when it is still an open question whether global warming is harmful or beneficial. Meanwhile, more important environmental issues (smoking, overfishing, deforestation, overuse of fertilizers, indoor air pollution, outdoor air pollution, antibiotic overuse, overpopulation in poor countries, asbestos in poor countries) get little attention.
(By the way, stop quoting the Pope, celebrities, and natural scientists on public policies. Logic, ethics, and public policies are not their areas of expertise.)
"Ooga booga. Don't use fiscal policies or a trillion dollar platinum coin. The economy is self-correcting."
Of course, the hands off economists are often silent when it comes to the thousands of policies that redistribute money to the top.
We're told to fear whites most of all, despite the fact that individuals from some other ethnoracial groups are many, many times more likely to commit stranger on stranger interracial crimes.
"Ooga booga. White tr*sh. White privilege. White terrorism. Whoops! It's past my bedtime. Let me retire to my mansion that happens to be in a gated community for no reason at all."
I'm so effing sick of establishment egoism, propaganda, contradictions, and gradual mass destruction.
Monday, January 11, 2016
Signs of Life and Death
I have scant evidence for the following claims since little research is done on these things, but it appears white political thinking is moving in slightly better directions, at least outside of wealthy circles.
Signs of progress compared to several years ago:
The popularity of totalitarian neoconservatism among ordinary citizens declined, especially the version supported by the Bushes, though Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio or Hillary Clinton could steal the executive office.
Race realism and counter jihadism often united, brought on by the situation in Europe. Ten years ago counter jihadists bombarded race realists with slurs as if counter jihadists thought they could escape establishment opprobrium by throwing race realists under the bus. Fact facers realize genes and cultures both matter, though some counter jihadists (Robert Spencer) still act as if culture is almost everything.
Despite his massive defects, Donald Trump has redirected many Republicans from knee-jerk economic redistribution to billionaires to nonwhite invasion issues.
Pan-European ideas are spreading.
Signs of decline:
The latest Pope provides full bore support for antiwhite totalitarianism. Western militaries do likewise. Establishment propaganda is turning into an exact science.
What little democracy existed in the Western world is almost gone.
Living standards continue to decline, and the decline is covered up with hedonic pricing, statistical redefinitions, and other fallacies.
Self-described neoreactionaries are no help. The word reaction*ry is a slur used by ruling groups and followers of Marx. No movement that describes itself as a widely accepted slur has ever gained power. Would a majority support a party calling itself the D*mb Party, no matter the content of their characters? The millions of individuals tarred as reactionaries and murdered would be spinning in their graves (if they could) at the thought of people willingly calling themselves reactionaries. Neoreactionaries blame democratic systems that don't exist while praising the kings and queens who got us into this mess.
Chinese, Russian, and Western rulers are more similar than different, almost all are devoted to egoism, militarism, and biocultural Marxism.
The tribal fanaticism of white multiculturalists keeps increasing, impervious to ethical reasoning. Years ago multiculturalists would cite Eisenhower as an example of a moderate Republican. Now they regard Eisenhower as a pariah for not being antiwhite enough.
More oligopolies. More dysgenic breeding. More environmental destruction.
Signs of progress compared to several years ago:
The popularity of totalitarian neoconservatism among ordinary citizens declined, especially the version supported by the Bushes, though Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio or Hillary Clinton could steal the executive office.
Race realism and counter jihadism often united, brought on by the situation in Europe. Ten years ago counter jihadists bombarded race realists with slurs as if counter jihadists thought they could escape establishment opprobrium by throwing race realists under the bus. Fact facers realize genes and cultures both matter, though some counter jihadists (Robert Spencer) still act as if culture is almost everything.
Despite his massive defects, Donald Trump has redirected many Republicans from knee-jerk economic redistribution to billionaires to nonwhite invasion issues.
Pan-European ideas are spreading.
Signs of decline:
The latest Pope provides full bore support for antiwhite totalitarianism. Western militaries do likewise. Establishment propaganda is turning into an exact science.
What little democracy existed in the Western world is almost gone.
Living standards continue to decline, and the decline is covered up with hedonic pricing, statistical redefinitions, and other fallacies.
Self-described neoreactionaries are no help. The word reaction*ry is a slur used by ruling groups and followers of Marx. No movement that describes itself as a widely accepted slur has ever gained power. Would a majority support a party calling itself the D*mb Party, no matter the content of their characters? The millions of individuals tarred as reactionaries and murdered would be spinning in their graves (if they could) at the thought of people willingly calling themselves reactionaries. Neoreactionaries blame democratic systems that don't exist while praising the kings and queens who got us into this mess.
Chinese, Russian, and Western rulers are more similar than different, almost all are devoted to egoism, militarism, and biocultural Marxism.
The tribal fanaticism of white multiculturalists keeps increasing, impervious to ethical reasoning. Years ago multiculturalists would cite Eisenhower as an example of a moderate Republican. Now they regard Eisenhower as a pariah for not being antiwhite enough.
More oligopolies. More dysgenic breeding. More environmental destruction.
The Visitor
During a break at a contract job, I tried to visit a tame, obscure ethnoracial realist web site (I forgot the name of it). The site was blocked because spurious h*te accusations. Somehow that obscure website had made The List. Every mass media political site I visited was not blocked. The wifi belonged to the company, so the company had a legal right to block sites. The company probably buys the blocking software and has only a vague idea of which sites are blocked.
The contradictions are what bothered me. Mass media political sites spew millions of antiwhite slurs, yet mass media sites were not blocked (the hard bigotry of low mass media moral expectations).
I visited Salon. I could have read the Salon article calling for whites to be burned alive. (No problem!) I could have read thousands of other articles devoted to antiwhite totalitarianism on other sites.
But if I wanted to read about whites peacefully seceding, no way.
The mere idea that nonwealthy whites might have claims for ethical autonomy and full human rights is anathema, but antiwhite demagoguery is treated as normalcy. And judging from their behaviors, almost all multiculturalists have no inkling they are doing anything wrong.
The contradictions are what bothered me. Mass media political sites spew millions of antiwhite slurs, yet mass media sites were not blocked (the hard bigotry of low mass media moral expectations).
I visited Salon. I could have read the Salon article calling for whites to be burned alive. (No problem!) I could have read thousands of other articles devoted to antiwhite totalitarianism on other sites.
But if I wanted to read about whites peacefully seceding, no way.
The mere idea that nonwealthy whites might have claims for ethical autonomy and full human rights is anathema, but antiwhite demagoguery is treated as normalcy. And judging from their behaviors, almost all multiculturalists have no inkling they are doing anything wrong.
Big Families
Whites should be churning out children. Who will protect you and your spouse if stuff really hits the fan?
Liberal and conservative multiculturalists with their zeal for antiwhite totalitarianism?
Random Christians?
Today's Christians are more concerned with the afterlife, most being multiculturalists. And multiculturalists are definitely not trustworthy.
Your neighbors?
You're unlikely to have trustworthy, fact facing neighbors.
Let's face it. Most contemporary whites are unpredictable, no band of brothers, easily indoctrinated, pretending to be rebels while absorbing unrelenting ideological garbage from schools, churches, media, corporations, and governments. The results show in poor character.
In collapse situations, unrelated acquaintances will kill for food. Hamilton's rule, altruism is proportional to relatedness, applies all the more in survival situations. Harm doing is inversely proportional to relatedness. (For example, the probability of a stepfather killing a child is dozens of times greater than that of a married biological parent, partly because stepfathers and stepchildren have bad genetic and environmental backgrounds. But the rest results from biological altruism or lack of it.)
How many unrelated friends, trustworthy in even the worst circumstances, do most whites have? Maybe some have 20 white friends they should trust no matter how bad things get. But given the nihilistic, hedonistic, xenocentric, and misanthropic tendencies of most modern whites, that trust may be misplaced. All it takes is one infiltrator to open up on the rest with a fast firing weapon. Multiculturalists and their allies are excellent at infiltration, Machiavellianism, and free riding. Subtle and thorough indoctrination in cultural Marxism causes most whites to feel extreme, unreasoned shame for thinking anything other than xenocentric ethnoracial thoughts. Organizing a group of unrelated, contemporary whites for anything other than establishment narratives is exceedingly difficult,
So have numerous children. If you have a decent job, what else can you do with your money? Hedonism is a self-defeating end. Establishment charities are crooked and destructive. Organizing ethnoracial fact facers is a great idea but doing so should go hand in hand with family.
If a few children support cultural Marxism, let them flee to San Francisco or elsewhere. You still have the good children left. Give the gift of life.
Larger groups have the highest probabilities of surviving and thriving in survival situations.
Most misbehaving teenagers eventually conclude that mom and dad are not so bad after all. Hollywood exaggerates conflicts in white families because drama sells. A TV show about a cohesive white family would have almost no viewers.
The important things parents give (love, discipline, food, water, and exposure to worthwhile careers) are inexpensive. The other important thing, a good nonparental environment with little cultural Marxism, can be expensive, depending on where you live.
Helicopter parenting is a morass of fallacious nurture assumptions. Consumer goods won't make your children better. Vacations, dance lessons, and other expensive activities have little impact on how children turn out. The IQs and non home behaviors of children are the result of genes and nonparental environments. Baby Mozart crap and other gimmicks have almost no impact on adult IQ and behavior.
A prepping family of 14 has a much better chance of surviving than isolated preppers. Add grandchildren and your family self-defense becomes even stronger.
The fact that you are reading this article indicates you are probably more ethical than most individuals, though our rulers tried to indoctrinate you with white ontological guilt. You will give your genes for ethical behavior to your children.
The xenocentrism of contemporary whites can not and will not last. Either nonwhites, with their devotion to tribalism and other ingroup favoritisms, will destroy whites or whites will face facts and organize.
Liberal and conservative multiculturalists with their zeal for antiwhite totalitarianism?
Random Christians?
Today's Christians are more concerned with the afterlife, most being multiculturalists. And multiculturalists are definitely not trustworthy.
Your neighbors?
You're unlikely to have trustworthy, fact facing neighbors.
Let's face it. Most contemporary whites are unpredictable, no band of brothers, easily indoctrinated, pretending to be rebels while absorbing unrelenting ideological garbage from schools, churches, media, corporations, and governments. The results show in poor character.
In collapse situations, unrelated acquaintances will kill for food. Hamilton's rule, altruism is proportional to relatedness, applies all the more in survival situations. Harm doing is inversely proportional to relatedness. (For example, the probability of a stepfather killing a child is dozens of times greater than that of a married biological parent, partly because stepfathers and stepchildren have bad genetic and environmental backgrounds. But the rest results from biological altruism or lack of it.)
How many unrelated friends, trustworthy in even the worst circumstances, do most whites have? Maybe some have 20 white friends they should trust no matter how bad things get. But given the nihilistic, hedonistic, xenocentric, and misanthropic tendencies of most modern whites, that trust may be misplaced. All it takes is one infiltrator to open up on the rest with a fast firing weapon. Multiculturalists and their allies are excellent at infiltration, Machiavellianism, and free riding. Subtle and thorough indoctrination in cultural Marxism causes most whites to feel extreme, unreasoned shame for thinking anything other than xenocentric ethnoracial thoughts. Organizing a group of unrelated, contemporary whites for anything other than establishment narratives is exceedingly difficult,
So have numerous children. If you have a decent job, what else can you do with your money? Hedonism is a self-defeating end. Establishment charities are crooked and destructive. Organizing ethnoracial fact facers is a great idea but doing so should go hand in hand with family.
If a few children support cultural Marxism, let them flee to San Francisco or elsewhere. You still have the good children left. Give the gift of life.
Larger groups have the highest probabilities of surviving and thriving in survival situations.
Most misbehaving teenagers eventually conclude that mom and dad are not so bad after all. Hollywood exaggerates conflicts in white families because drama sells. A TV show about a cohesive white family would have almost no viewers.
The important things parents give (love, discipline, food, water, and exposure to worthwhile careers) are inexpensive. The other important thing, a good nonparental environment with little cultural Marxism, can be expensive, depending on where you live.
Helicopter parenting is a morass of fallacious nurture assumptions. Consumer goods won't make your children better. Vacations, dance lessons, and other expensive activities have little impact on how children turn out. The IQs and non home behaviors of children are the result of genes and nonparental environments. Baby Mozart crap and other gimmicks have almost no impact on adult IQ and behavior.
A prepping family of 14 has a much better chance of surviving than isolated preppers. Add grandchildren and your family self-defense becomes even stronger.
The fact that you are reading this article indicates you are probably more ethical than most individuals, though our rulers tried to indoctrinate you with white ontological guilt. You will give your genes for ethical behavior to your children.
The xenocentrism of contemporary whites can not and will not last. Either nonwhites, with their devotion to tribalism and other ingroup favoritisms, will destroy whites or whites will face facts and organize.
Sunday, January 10, 2016
For Those Who Have Not Figured It Out Yet
What contemporary "American" political parties support in practice:
Republican Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, super militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Democratic Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, robber baronism, super cultural Marxism
Libertarian Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Green Party: cronyism, globalism, welfarism, super militarism, super cultural Marxism
Constitution Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, evangelicalism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Justice Party: cronyism, globalism, welfarism, militarism, financial reformism, cultural Marxism
American Populist Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Communist Party USA: cronyism, globalism, economic Marxism, super militarism, super cultural Marxism
Freedom Socialist Party: cronyism, globalism, economic Marxism, super militarism, super cultural Marxism
Reform Party: cronyism, super austerity, globalism, militarism, fair trade, robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Objectivist Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
On the plus side, the Justice Party claims to support financial reforms, the reform party fair trade. On the negative side, almost everything else.
Then there's Kevin MacDonald's American Freedom Party. The platform on its website looks better than almost all current political parties, but given the Occidental Observer's preoccupation with wrongs done by Jews rather than the platform, the party's commitment to the platform seems unlikely.
Some may object that I'm cynical. But the above is truth, and the truth matters more than any ad hominem tag thrown at me. The above practices are not short term fads. Most political parties have been doing those isms for decades. The ultimate cynicism lies within those casually rejecting well-reasoned evidence, replacing the search for evidence with group beliefs, feel good beliefs or belief in what gets repeated most often in the media.
Note that any party supporting legalized bribery also supports most of the atrocious things above, no matter the rhetoric. Legalized bribery overwhelms scruples in current politicians.
The major parties in other Western countries are variations on the same themes.
That's why it is crucial that we form separate organizations and communities.
Thousands of reforms should be done, and current political parties are rent seeking, not reformng.
Republican Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, super militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Democratic Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, robber baronism, super cultural Marxism
Libertarian Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Green Party: cronyism, globalism, welfarism, super militarism, super cultural Marxism
Constitution Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, evangelicalism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Justice Party: cronyism, globalism, welfarism, militarism, financial reformism, cultural Marxism
American Populist Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Communist Party USA: cronyism, globalism, economic Marxism, super militarism, super cultural Marxism
Freedom Socialist Party: cronyism, globalism, economic Marxism, super militarism, super cultural Marxism
Reform Party: cronyism, super austerity, globalism, militarism, fair trade, robber baronism, cultural Marxism
Objectivist Party: cronyism, austerity, globalism, militarism, super robber baronism, cultural Marxism
On the plus side, the Justice Party claims to support financial reforms, the reform party fair trade. On the negative side, almost everything else.
Then there's Kevin MacDonald's American Freedom Party. The platform on its website looks better than almost all current political parties, but given the Occidental Observer's preoccupation with wrongs done by Jews rather than the platform, the party's commitment to the platform seems unlikely.
Some may object that I'm cynical. But the above is truth, and the truth matters more than any ad hominem tag thrown at me. The above practices are not short term fads. Most political parties have been doing those isms for decades. The ultimate cynicism lies within those casually rejecting well-reasoned evidence, replacing the search for evidence with group beliefs, feel good beliefs or belief in what gets repeated most often in the media.
Note that any party supporting legalized bribery also supports most of the atrocious things above, no matter the rhetoric. Legalized bribery overwhelms scruples in current politicians.
The major parties in other Western countries are variations on the same themes.
That's why it is crucial that we form separate organizations and communities.
Thousands of reforms should be done, and current political parties are rent seeking, not reformng.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)