Spectrum of Fallacies

The idea of a one dimensional political spectrum is utterly inaccurate. Contemporary democrats, republicans, and libertarians are not centrist, moderate, center left, or center right. Contemporary democrats support conservatism on economic issues, a mixture of Marxism and neoconservatism in foreign policies and religious issues, cultural Marxism on ethnoracial issues. Republicans and libertarians in practice are not much different except for endorsing more neoconservatism and economic conservatism. None of the above makes them good or somewhere near some imaginary middle. A better term for the major political parties is triple totalitarianism--militarism, robber baronism, plus cultural Marxism. Is it anywhere near as bad as Mao's China, North Korea, the Soviet Union, or Hitler's Germany. No. But soft totalitarianism is not centrism.

Third Wayers subscribe to the faulty idea that if it were not for Republican obstructionism and rotten ideas, democrats would do right things. We saw in 2009 and 2010, when democrats controlled the federal government, that democrats were an ethical disaster (not as bad as Republicans but still a disaster). In case anyone forgot, the main democratic pushes in 2009 and 2010:

1. escalating the quagmire in Afghanistan (apparently so democrats would appear tough).
2. tokenistic financial reforms.
3. reappointing the disastrous Ben Bernanke.
4. not punishing financiers.
5. bailing out financiers for their financial crimes.
6. letting the super rich get away with almost all manner of crimes.
7. austerity: a miniscule stimulus, a fraction of the six percent of GDP required to make up for the shortfall in demand.
8. the "grand bargain," cuts to retirement programs and even more austerity.
9. ever more cultural Marxism.
10. maintaining Bush's policies on civil liberties.
11. globalism.

Sure, the democrats did good things on numerous minor issues, issues where no unethical, powerful interest would make major sacrifices, issues with a fraction of the importance compared to the big issues. But on all the big issues, the democrats did wrong things.

Democrats conveniently forgot most of the things democratic voters thought they were voting for.

Democrats work to redistribute income to the top. President Obama has presided over a massive increase in inequality, worse than some Republican presidents. But democrats do not redistribute to the top in all the ways republicans do. Democrats will not push for massive tax cuts for the rich because doing so would send huge numbers of  democratic voters to third party. Instead, democrats redistribute to the top using subtle and indirect methods:

1. letting the rich and others devoted to rent seeking get away with crimes.
2. maintaining high levels of unemployment, so workers have less bargaining power.
3. tolerating legalized bribery and other forms of legalized corruption.

Some democratic politicians may not even be consciously aware of the consequences of democratic actions. As Democrats pursue pro rich ideas and cash flows in, it becomes easy to regard well-reasoned reforms as "risky" and "dangerous extremism."

Healthy foods Versus Unhealthy Foods: a Short Guide

After reading various studies, I conclude:

Bad:
fructose, including high calorie fruits (grapes, mangos among many, many)
sugar substitutes
fat substitutes
other sugars
processed meats
trans fats
other junk carbs (bread, rice)
high-calorie vegetables (cooked potatoes)
red meat
foods with emulsifiers (mayo)

Good:
white meat
beans
lentils
textured vegetable protein
some vegetable oils
wheat bran
oat bran
hummus
low sugar, low calorie vegetables
other high fiber, low sugar foods
other high protein, low sugar foods
most spices

Worst Political Websites I Can Recall Seeing

Worse and Worser:

Saudiembassy.net, Reddit, Free Republic, Weekly Standard, NYT, NR, Cato, BBC, AEI, Alternet, Al Jezerra, WSJ, Wapo, Commentary, Real Clear Politics, The Nation, Real Clear World, GOP.com, Fox, CNN, Salon, Slate, MSNBC, Drudge, Democrats.org, Stormfront, TNR, Wsws.org, Rushlimbaugh.com, Fair.org, Heritage, Spectator.org, Dickmorris.com, Littlegreenfootballs, Feministing, Newsweek, SPLC, Russiatoday.com, Loonwatch, Young Turks, Daily Stormer, Georgewbush.com, Kremlin.ru, China.org.cn, alarabiya.net, Time, Common Dreams, Pjorourke.com, Victors Message Board, Zimbabwetourism.net, Cair.com, The Thinking Housewife

Care to add more?

It's the Trap

Almost every attempted reform in occupied, nondemocratic Western countries results in the following:

A: getting you demonized and otherwise harmed by the ruling groups, and their totalitarian mixtures of Randism, neoconservatism, third wayism, and biocultural Marxism, thus failing to reform.

B: being ignored

Thus, the few reforms that occur are tokenistic for propaganda purposes or remote, where almost no one around the ruling groups has an interest--for example, the marine sanctuaries created by Bush and Obama around territories. The Bush marine sanctuary appears to be the only thing Bush did right during his entire time in power.

That's why we must organize and form our own separate communities.

Documentaries

Some rough grades for documentaries I watched in the past decade, graded and ranked mostly on entertainment value or inspirational value, not ethical accuracy.

Exit Through the Gift Shop: A
Give Up Tomorrow: A
Harlan County, USA: A-
Power Trip: A-
The King of Kong: A-
American Dream: A-
Gates of Heaven: B+
The Boys of H Company: B+
Occupation Dreamland: B+
Never Forget to Lie: B+
Under Our Skin: B+
Tibet: Cry of the Snow Lion: B+
The Cove: B+
Untitled lost battalion documentary (available almost nowhere): B+
Buck: B+
Paradise Lost: B+
Happy People: B+
Armadillo: B+
Casino Jack: B+
Hearts of Darkness: B+
Tales from the Script: B+
Tragedy of Bataan: B
Brother's Keeper: B
Nova B-29: Frozen in Time: B
The Yes Men: B
World War II in HD: B
Capturing the Friedmans: B
Client 9: B
Korea: The Forgotten War: B
Being Elmo: B
Religulous: B
Hearts and Minds: B
Little Dieter Needs to Fly: B
Out of Sight: B
Floored: B
Scared Straight! (worthless anti-crime tactic but amusing documentary): B
Anne Frank Remembered: B
We Stand Alone Together: B
Why We Fight (Frank Capra version): B
Scrappers: B-
Blossoms of Fire: B-
Secrets of the Dead: Irish Escape: B-
Pink Floyd: Live at Pompeii: B-
Super Size Me: B-
The Tillman Story: B-
Devil's Playground: B-
Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill: B-
The Farmer’s Wife: B-
The Decline of Western Civilization Part II: The Metal Years: B-
The Korean War: Fire and Ice: B-
Best Boy: B-
Roger and Me: B-
The War Tapes: B-
A Perfect Candidate: B-
Limelight (starts slow but gets bizarre towards the end): C+
Fahrenheit 9/11: C
Atomic Cafe (seemed better in the 80s before nuclear irony became a cliche): C-
Nanook of the North: D+
Bill Cunningham New York (people thinking banal thoughts are profound): D+
Bukowski: Born Into This (ditto above): D+
Wordplay: D+
Capitalism: a Love Story: D+
Mugabe and the White African (quixotic waste of time in a toothless court): D+
Hell And Back Again: D+
Restrepo (nothing insightful not seen or heard before): D+
Prodigal Sons (two siblings complaining about each other): D+
American Movie (grating and boring character): D
Crumb (another grating and boring character): D
Body of War: D
A Film Unfinished: D
Korea: The Unknown War: D
Knocking: D
Capturing Reality: D
Grey Gardens: D-
Enlighten Up: D-
The World at War: D-
China: A Century of Revolution (Marxian propaganda): D-
Guns, Germs, and Steel: D-
The Fog of War (terrible moral reasoning by both McNamara and the filmmaker): D-
Elephant in the Living Room (The box cover describes the main character as big hearted. He's not.): F
The War by Ken Burns: F

Note that I did not pay Hollywood a dime for any of them. I obtained them from the library.

Mostly First Person Books Rated and Ranked

I've been reading oral histories and other up close books in recent years. The Internet is better for macro issues these days than books. I've rated and ranked books below in rough order of interest they generated in my soul, not historical accuracy or other attributes. The most worthwhile works are difficult to find.

Death March by Donald Knox: A
Harder than Hardscrabble by Thad Sitton: A-
This Is Paradise by Hyok Kang: A-
The Black Devil Brigade by Joseph Springer (starts slow): A-
If You Survive by George Wilson: B+
Easy Company Soldier by Don Malarkey: B+
The Korean War: Pusan to Chosin by Donald Knox: B+
Hey, Mac, Where You Been? by Henry Berry: B+
No Bugles, No Drums by Rudy Tomedi: B+
You'll Die in Singapore by Charles McCormack: B+
Foot Soldier by Roscoe C. Blunt: B+
Indestructible by John R. Bruning (entertaining but fictionalized dialog): B+
The Scars of a Soldier by Vernon Heppe (starts slow): B+
Everything We Had by Al Santoli: B+
Nam by Mark Baker: B+
Bataan Uncensored by Ernest Miller: B+
The Last Battle Station by Duane Schultz B+
Comfort Women Speak by Sangmie Choi Schellstede and Soon Mi Yu (not much text, mostly photos): B+
Into the Rising Sun by Patrick O'Donnell: B+
The Brave Japanese by Kenneth Harrison: B+
House of Bush, House of Saud by Craig Unger: B+
Where Away by George Sessions Perry and Isabel Leighton (starts slow): B+
The Naked Island by Russell Braddon: B
Once a Hussar by Ray Ellis: B
Medic! by Robert "Doc Joe" Franklin B
Bataan and Beyond by John S. Coleman: B
Visions from a Foxhole by William A. Foley, Jr: B
Crossing the Line by Alvin Kernan: B
Witness by Joshua M. Greene and Shiva Kumar: B
Gig by John Bowe, Marisa Bowe, Sabin C. Streeter: B
On the Front Lines by John Ellis: B
Guests of the Emperor by Linda Goetz Holmes: B
Voices from D-Day by Jonathan Bastable: B
Brothers in Battle, Best of Friends by William Guarnere and Edward Heffron: B
Beyond Valor by Patrick O'Donnell: B
Sappers in the Wire by Keith W. Nolan: B
Voices of the Pacific by Adam Makos: B
Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich: B
Company Commander by Charles MacDonald (starts slow): B
American Involvement in the Filipino Resistance Movement by L.S. Schmidt (monograph): B
To Bear Any Burden by Al Santoli: B-
Roll Me Over by Ray Gantter (more self-contradictions and political fallacies than usual): B-
Abandoned on Bataan by Oliver "Red" Allen: B-
Our War Was Different by Albert Hemingway: B-
The Dyess Story by Ed Dyess: B-
Strange Ground: An Oral History Of Americans In Vietnam by Harry Maurer: B-
The Outpost War (Volume 1) by Lee Ballenger: C+
The Korean War: Uncertain Victory by Donald Knox: C+
Armageddon by Clive Ponting C+
Ghost Soldiers by Hampton Sides: C+
War Stories of the Infantry by Michael Green and James D. Brown: C+
Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand: C+
Working by Studs Terkel: C
Bat 21 by William C. Anderson: C
The "Good" War by Studs Terkel: C-
Five Years to Freedom by James N. Rowe (too long): D+
They Fought Alone by John Keats (mostly a novel): D
American Sniper by Chris Kyle: D
Rage in Singapore by David George Plotkin (mostly a novel): D
The Forgotten Soldier by Guy Sajer: D-
The War by Ken Burns: D-
Lost in Shangri-La by Mitchell Zuckoff (verbose and boring): F

These books contain many false claims, ad hominem attacks, small sample fallacies, one-sided arguments, appeals to tradition, and other logical failings. In other words, the accuracy of these books differs little from books by people paid by taxpayers to be historians.

Corruption and the West

Corruption is worse in the West than most poor countries.

The West is currently a non democratic colony of super rich noncitizens and de facto noncitizens. At least most poor countries aren't being invaded and conquered by those devoted to spreading mass destruction. As their percentages increase, destruction rises exponentially, not linearly. The consequences of today's corruptions in the West will be experienced for thousands of generations.

In Western countries, almost every institution is corrupt, including most families. At least in poor countries, the corruption is not so encompassing.

The West has more money, but that is primarily due to the high productivity and cohesiveness of whites, not lack of corruption.

Many working class whites would rather live in a country of ethical whites having a per capita income of two dollars per day than a wealthy, hellish land devoted to Randism, nihilism, hedonism, neoconservatism, techno utopianism, third wayism, and biocultural Marxism.

(Of course, a country filled only with ethical whites will have a far larger per capita income than two dollars per day.)

A minimum wage income in the West isn't worth much anyway if you have to spend it all on rent, food, taxes, utilities, insurance, miseducation, transportation, various other oligopolies, and people devoted to harming you.

Yes, we even put up with the degradation of paying for our own destruction.

The No Super Slur Challenge.

As soon as you see a super slur in an article, stop reading. Go someplace else. The rest of the article is probably not well-reasoned anyway. The opportunity costs of reading that article might prevent you from reading something better.

For the unfamiliar, examples of super slurs include c*nt, co*n, go*k, r*cist, p*nko, b*got, n*zi, femin*zi, cow*rd, n*gger, cr*cker, redn*ck, sh*tlord, Stal*nist, nat*vist, w*t back, Islam*phobe, far l*ft, far r*ght, wh*te supremecist, black nation*list, and white nation*list.

You will be glad you did. And it will be good for your character, the most important part of your being.

West of Eden

I just sat through The Perilous Fight, another error spewing, white bashing, non-white worshipping documentary, so I have questions for the multiculturalists about Japan and Japanese Americans, especially the fawning claims about how ethical, patriotic, democratic, and victimized the Japanese Americans were and are:

Why weren't Japanese Americans, alleged paragons of multicultural virtue, fighting with all their might to stop Japanese aggression in China from 1931 to 1941? (Almost surely, Japanese Americans were in a better position to influence the Japanese government than other Americans.)

Why were Japanese Americans and the Japanese government constantly complaining about mild discrimination in the West while ignoring or supporting mass rape, murder, and enslavement by the Japanese government?

Why did nearly all the millions of Japanese adult settlers in Asia and the Western Pacific help Japan, not the peoples in the lands they migrated into?

Why weren't the oh-so-patriotic Japanese Americans lined up outside American military recruiting offices on December 8, 1941?

Why did only four percent of male, military age Japanese Americans eventually volunteer for the U.S. military in World War II?

Japanese Americans visiting Japan on December 8, 1941 readily helped Japan and later served as translators in Japanese death camps. Why did these translators do almost nothing to help their imprisoned fellow Americans, who were being daily starved and tortured? Instead, these translators excoriated America and made glib, surreal conversations to Allied human skeletons about plans to move back to the U.S. once the war was over, exhibiting almost no ethical concerns.

Millions of Americans were interned in the U.S. military from 1941 to 1945 in conditions (Hurtgen, New Guinea, and elsewhere) far more horrific than the vacation camps Japanese Americans lived in. Why is this fact ignored?

Many Japanese Americans were paid reparations by the U.S. government for their stays in comparitive vacation camps. How many Japanese Americans donated their reparations to Asian survivors of World War II, who endured pure hell and had their lives ruined thanks to Japan, receiving nothing from Japan?

Why are almost all World War II oral histories from Japanese full of self-justifying BS?

Why weren't Japanese Americans countering the constant onslaught of anti-Western and anti-Asian bigotry being spewed by Japanese institutions during the decades leading up to World War II?

Why are present day Japanese and Japanese Americans silent or supportive of revisionist baloney such as the "Co-prosperity Sphere," which was little more than a sphere of rape, murder, torture, and enslavement?

Why are Japanese Americans, supposed multicultural universalists, so eager to call fellow white Americans slurs such as r*cist and b*got while not calling Japanese slurs for behavior thousands of times worse?

Why were non-Japanese Asian civilians, forced into helping the Japanese, called c*llaborators, deserving of death or condemnation, while arms producing Japanese at Nagasaki and Hiroshima were considered innocent civilians?

Why are there so many memorials throughout Asia and the Pacific dedicated to Japanese soldiers who engaged in mass murder? Why did Japan oppose memorials at death camp sites for Allied soldiers who were bravely defending against Japanese aggression?

Why did Japan think it had the right to stop the opening of a California memorial to comfort women?

In the 1930s, Japanese newspapers entertained readers with an ongoing sword killing contest as if the killing of Chinese were a sport. How many Japanese and Japanese Americans reported this contest to the outside world?

A Japanee soldier in the Philippines refused to surrender when World War II ended. He hid in forests and serial murdered Filipinos for decades. Why was he treated as a hero when he finally went back to Japan?

The Japanese American 442nd Regimental Combat Team received 21 Medals of Honor for fighting in Europe. Douglas MacArthur received a Medal of Honor despite ranking among the worst generals in U.S. history. Yet no  American enlisted man or woman in the defense of the Philippines received a Medal of Honor despite fighting bravely, suffering incompetent leadership, and enduring nearly four years of hell. These POW enlisted men engaged in millions of brave sabotage acts against Japanese war industries, knowing full well that if caught their daily tortures would be increased unto death. Why the differences?

During the Cold War, Toshiba willfully sold top secret military technology to the Soviet Union, technology that could have cost millions of Westerners their lives. Why does Toshiba still exist? Why no severe punishments for its executives?

In what ways are Chinese propaganda techniques for the past 70 years similar to propaganda techniques of the Japanese Empire?

Should Nixon's opening up of Communist China be considered as ominous as the opening up of Japan in the 19th Century?

Hollywood movies increasingly "humanize" Japanize soldiers as nice guys caught up in circumstances, though their actual beliefs and actions were more horrific than multiculturalists are willing to imagine. Why the despicable contradiction between humanizing barbarity and dehumanizing ethnoracial realists, who are telling moral facts? Why are ethical persons such as JP Rushton treated as worse than Hirohito, the latter responsible for nearly 30 million unwarranted deaths? Care to explain the millions of other despicable contradictions in multiculturalism?

How is Japan a Western ally? Japan's policies are riddled with mercantilism. Japan is doing almost nothing to increase global demand in the face of austerity and almost nothing to stop the invasion of the West by non-white peoples. If war occurs between China and Japan, why should millions of whites die to save Japanese who despise whites? Even as whites' own countries are being demographically invaded and conquered?